How Many of Us Are Voting for Gary Johnson 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:15:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  How Many of Us Are Voting for Gary Johnson 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How Many of Us Are Voting for Gary Johnson 2016? (Also Which State Do You Think He Does the Best In?)
#1
Voting for Johnson
 
#2
Voting for Clinton
 
#3
Voting for Trump
 
#4
Not Voting for Any of These Losers
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 118

Author Topic: How Many of Us Are Voting for Gary Johnson 2016?  (Read 2801 times)
sparkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,103


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: -7.30

« on: May 03, 2016, 09:51:36 PM »

I'm a McAfee supporter, but I fully realize that GJ is more likely to get the LP nomination. If GJ does indeed get it, I'm fully prepared to switch to him and support him as I did in 2012.
Logged
sparkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,103


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: -7.30

« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2016, 10:58:20 AM »

Can one of the Yellow Avatars explain to me the main differences between the Libertarian candidates? And are they all doomed to lose against Gary Johnson?

It's mostly a difference in style, and Johnson is the frontrunner, although not a complete lock. McAfee is probably the only candidate not to really represent a specific faction of the party as Petersen and Perry do, plus he has been hovering around having 2nd to 3rd highest support, so I think he's easily the 2nd most likely to get the nomination.

Here are some actual policy differences:

Abortion:
Pro-choice: Johnson, McAfee, Perry
Pro-life: Petersen

Anti-discrimination laws:
Private and public: Johnson
Public only: McAfee, Perry, Petersen

GMOs:
Anti-labeling: Perry, Petersen
Pro-labeling: Johnson, McAfee

Office of Digital Transformation:
Create: McAfee
Don't create: Johnson, Perry, Petersen

Standing army:
Abolish: Perry
Keep but reduce: Johnson, McAfee, Petersen

Taxes:
Lower, move to consumption: Johnson
Lower, flatten: McAfee, Perry, Petersen
Logged
sparkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,103


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: -7.30

« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2016, 05:42:39 PM »
« Edited: May 04, 2016, 05:44:23 PM by sparkey »

GMOs:
Anti-labeling: Perry, Petersen
Pro-labeling: Johnson, McAfee

Oh god, I may have to step off the McAfee train.

I got that from his responses to isidewith: "Should producers be required to label genetically engineered foods (GMOs)?" "John McAfee: Yes"

However, I tried to find him supporting that position, and only found a seemingly contradictory answer given to the Libertarian Skeptics Network: "Do you oppose regulations mandating an arbitrary definition and punitive label for genetically engineered crops, and the associated implication that this life-saving technology is harmful and should be banned?" "I oppose call [sic] regulation. Period."

Somebody should pin McAfee down.

Johnson, though, is definitely pro-labeling. "I have celiac disease, so I need food labeled. I think food should be labeled, and that would include GMOs in food."

FWIW I am anti-labeling, but it's not a deal breaker for me.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.