What has been the worst decision/action on the GOP primary side this year? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:42:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  What has been the worst decision/action on the GOP primary side this year? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: skip
#1
All the candidates ignoring Trump early on
 
#2
CRUZ/FIORINA
 
#3
Carson's money laundering campaign scheme
 
#4
Kasich staying in MONTHS after he should have dropped out
 
#5
Jeb's awkward attempt to counter Trump
 
#6
Rubio attacking Trump's hands
 
#7
Prideful candidates not getting order to take on Trump one-one-one unified early on
 
#8
Cruz lying about Carson getting out on caucus day
 
#9
Paul insta-targeting Trump in the first and second debates
 
#10
Trump's conspiracy theories about Rafael Cruz
 
#11
Write-In/Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 59

Author Topic: What has been the worst decision/action on the GOP primary side this year?  (Read 2301 times)
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


« on: May 04, 2016, 12:19:35 AM »

Of what was provided:

i. Not calling out/defining Trump early. Cruz and Rubio literally ignored (or sometimes mildly supported) Trump on the debate stage

ii. Not coalescing. To be fair, there was no clear person to collapse upon. Rubio was too much of a greenhorn, Kasich is too weird (despite LOLfric's obession of him), Cruz too factional, Carson a clear con artist, Bush emasculated, etc. etc.

If Rubio hadn't been a moron and you know, actually developed a ground game and made a clear effort to win a state (Iowa or South Carolina) and executed upon it, he would've had a glide path to the nomination.
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2016, 10:24:32 AM »

If Rubio hadn't been a moron and you know, actually developed a ground game and made a clear effort to win a state (Iowa or South Carolina) and executed upon it, he would've had a glide path to the nomination.

People keep saying Rubio had a path. Since when?

Rubios campaign was a cross between a David Lynch film and a socially inept robot.

Interesting in his own mind, yet incapable of atracting people on a scale necessary to win the nomination.



This is my point. His campaign never even attempted to define a path to the nomination; he was hoping it would all just fall into place. A Rubio who actually built a ground game in the first 4 states had a significantly higher chance of winning Iowa and South Carolina.

I agree that he was (and still is, to some degree) an overhyped candidate. Republicans wanted their Obama, but the best they could  find a lazier, less intelligent, and less charismatic legislative lightweight.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 15 queries.