If Rubio hadn't been a moron and you know, actually developed a ground game and made a clear effort to win a state (Iowa or South Carolina) and executed upon it, he would've had a glide path to the nomination.
People keep saying Rubio had a path. Since when?
Rubios campaign was a cross between a David Lynch film and a socially inept robot.
Interesting in his own mind, yet incapable of atracting people on a scale necessary to win the nomination.
This is my point. His campaign never even attempted to define a path to the nomination; he was hoping it would all just fall into place. A Rubio who actually built a ground game in the first 4 states had a significantly higher chance of winning Iowa and South Carolina.
I agree that he was (and still is, to some degree) an overhyped candidate. Republicans wanted their Obama, but the best they could find a lazier, less intelligent, and less charismatic legislative lightweight.