What has been the worst decision/action on the GOP primary side this year? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 02:35:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  What has been the worst decision/action on the GOP primary side this year? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: skip
#1
All the candidates ignoring Trump early on
 
#2
CRUZ/FIORINA
 
#3
Carson's money laundering campaign scheme
 
#4
Kasich staying in MONTHS after he should have dropped out
 
#5
Jeb's awkward attempt to counter Trump
 
#6
Rubio attacking Trump's hands
 
#7
Prideful candidates not getting order to take on Trump one-one-one unified early on
 
#8
Cruz lying about Carson getting out on caucus day
 
#9
Paul insta-targeting Trump in the first and second debates
 
#10
Trump's conspiracy theories about Rafael Cruz
 
#11
Write-In/Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 59

Author Topic: What has been the worst decision/action on the GOP primary side this year?  (Read 2294 times)
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

« on: May 04, 2016, 12:39:50 AM »

Thinking they could just get a handful of rich guys to write million dollar checks and everything would sort itself out.

When you can be considered a serious candidate by winning the backing of a handful of people who can donate millions of dollars to you, without having to actually go out and prove you can connect with actual voters, there's a huge margin for error.

And when the party apparatus itself has been made relatively cash poor since big donors would rather put their money in super PACs, a collective action problem arises. That happened to a lesser extent in 2012 with Sheldon Adelson and various other billionaires dumping money into ads hammering Romney to create an opening for their own preferred candidates (Gingrich and Santorum) who didn't have a chance in hell of winning.

Say what you will about campaign finance and Citizens United and all that, but the Republican Party probably wishes that those 17 candidates had to go out and get $2,700 donations from thousands of people. It would have eliminated the empty suits before the process had even began.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2016, 01:27:24 AM »

Putting all the establishment money into Jeb Bush's campaign

Wouldn't be so much of a problem except that the Establishment's conception of what the GOP should be is basically the British Conservatives - across-the-board austerity, tax cuts for the super-rich and deregulation of banking and finance, while largely ignoring social/cultural issues or immigration. Jeb! was a fine candidate for that, but that agenda falls flat among actual GOP voters.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 15 queries.