DBWI: Trump's campaign does not collapse
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 11:41:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  DBWI: Trump's campaign does not collapse
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: DBWI: Trump's campaign does not collapse  (Read 1431 times)
NOT gonna be banned soon
Golfman76
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 08, 2016, 06:48:01 PM »

Remember, he was once leading in the polls. But after a humiliating 4th place behind Paul, Rubio and Cruz, his campaign was destroyed. He dropped out after Nevada, after being hit to 5th place. What if his campaign had succeeded?
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,703


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2016, 07:01:38 PM »

Instead of preparing for Marco Rubio getting inaugurated in one week , we likely would be preparing for the inauguration of Hillary Clinton
Logged
NOT gonna be banned soon
Golfman76
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2016, 07:15:21 PM »

Instead of preparing for Marco Rubio getting inaugurated in one week , we likely would be preparing for the inauguration of Hillary Clinton

*shudders*

But in all seriousness, A poll conducted last year in January shows that 20% of Democrats would had flocked to Trump. Besides, that October surprise really could had helped any Republican.
Logged
NOT gonna be banned soon
Golfman76
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2016, 07:33:24 PM »
« Edited: May 08, 2016, 08:39:52 PM by Golfman76 »

In case any of you guys forgot about the Republican primaries:



Marco Rubio (R-FL)
Ted Cruz (R-TX)
John Kasich (R-OH)
Rand Paul (R-KY)

In order of contests won.

Rubio faced a rocky road, but soon got a hang of it and became the nominee.

The 2016 election:



Rubio/Gingrich: 281 Electoral votes, 51.9%
Clinton/Hickenlooper: 257 Electoral votes, 47.6%
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2016, 07:59:55 PM »

Was the blue in the primaries Kasich or Christie? I just can't remember for some reason...
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2016, 07:49:54 PM »

Kasich, duh.

Gingrich was a nice choice to satisfy former Kasich supporters, especially as he moderated this election even before Iowa voted. However, I really hope the rumors of his ill health aren't true. There's a report somewhat believable stating he may have to resign as early as 2019.

((OOC: Is there a way to speed these up??))
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 09, 2016, 08:12:13 PM »

DBWI? Wrong website!
Logged
NOT gonna be banned soon
Golfman76
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 10, 2016, 02:50:00 PM »

I also had heard that Christie was just 1% short of reaching the NH debate. Who would had he attacked?
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 10, 2016, 03:29:22 PM »

Imagine if Haley and Scott had rallied behind Cruz! He would've won the nomination, then, no?
Logged
NOT gonna be banned soon
Golfman76
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 10, 2016, 05:42:50 PM »

Imagine if Haley and Scott had rallied behind Cruz! He would've won the nomination, then, no?

Makes sense, If Cruz had won S. Carolina, then he gets +50 delegates. And if he had won Florida, Rubio would had dropped out.
Logged
Mike Thick
tedbessell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,085


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -8.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 10, 2016, 05:58:56 PM »

I also had heard that Christie was just 1% short of reaching the NH debate. Who would had he attacked?

If he had made it? Probably Cruz or Paul, over foreign policy.

Honestly, though, I really don't think there was a chance at all. Peter King's late entry ate way into his already small base, especially in New Hampshire.
Logged
NOT gonna be banned soon
Golfman76
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 10, 2016, 06:11:35 PM »

I also had heard that Christie was just 1% short of reaching the NH debate. Who would had he attacked?

If he had made it? Probably Cruz or Paul, over foreign policy.

Honestly, though, I really don't think there was a chance at all. Peter King's late entry ate way into his already small base, especially in New Hampshire.

I agree, Christie and Paul always had feuds during the debates. Speaking of Debate Feuds, King DESTROYED Cruz. If it weren't for King, we would have been seeing a contested convention, after all, Rubio just got 1,288 delegates, just 51 more than he needed.
Logged
Mike Thick
tedbessell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,085


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -8.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 11, 2016, 05:56:14 PM »

I also had heard that Christie was just 1% short of reaching the NH debate. Who would had he attacked?

If he had made it? Probably Cruz or Paul, over foreign policy.

Honestly, though, I really don't think there was a chance at all. Peter King's late entry ate way into his already small base, especially in New Hampshire.

I agree, Christie and Paul always had feuds during the debates. Speaking of Debate Feuds, King DESTROYED Cruz. If it weren't for King, we would have been seeing a contested convention, after all, Rubio just got 1,288 delegates, just 51 more than he needed.

Eh, Cruz was just a weak candidate. I'm kind of surprised he got as far as he did. People in today's Republican party just don't seem to be as interested in far-right politics as they were, say, six years ago.

I'd also argue that the ISIS debacle would have kept Cruz from doing as well as he needed to in states like Oregon, New Mexico, and even Indiana delegate-wise. The NYSE attack really put a spotlight on his and Paul's positions on government surveillance and foreign intervention. Remember, Cruz had decent-sized leads in the March 26th states and a MASSIVE lead in Indiana, but Rubio ended up getting three of those five primaries and holding Cruz to a low-single-digit win. Paul was also doing pretty well, and stood to pick up a few delegates in the proportional states, but it's a miracle he even managed to win Montana.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 11, 2016, 07:50:46 PM »

Yeah, Secretary of Defense Peter King may be pretty meh on foreign policy, but at least unlike most politicians he knows what he's talking about on it. I can think of a lot worse people to be in charge of the military.

I've heard rumors King is trying to draft Representative Jason Villalba or another Mainstreet Republican to run against Cruz. Has anyone seen anything about primary polling for Texas?
Logged
Mike Thick
tedbessell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,085


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -8.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 11, 2016, 08:59:00 PM »
« Edited: May 11, 2016, 10:28:31 PM by Ted Bessell, Bass God of the West »

Yeah, Secretary of Defense Peter King may be pretty meh on foreign policy, but at least unlike most politicians he knows what he's talking about on it. I can think of a lot worse people to be in charge of the military.

I've heard rumors King is trying to draft Representative Jason Villalba or another Mainstreet Republican to run against Cruz. Has anyone seen anything about primary polling for Texas?

Emerson:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It's no surprise that his numbers are so low: he's insanely unpopular. Perot seems to have most of Trump's 2016 primary voters. He's done a good job of getting his name out ahead of his run, but I don't really see a lot of people that would back a more "establishment" figure getting behind him. McCaul has pretty low name recognition and room to grow -- and he can self-fund a ton. Dude's loaded. However, he should be a little concerned. Villalba, unsurprisingly, scores worst. He's pretty unknown outside of his House district. However, if King hits the trail for him, I could se it happening.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 11, 2016, 10:00:29 PM »

Is that pre or post-Villalba's election as U. S. Representative for District 3 when Samuel Johnson retired after a heart attack? If you'll remember, he won with the help of State Rep. Scott Turner, Fmr. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, George P. Bush, and the like against Tea Partier Dan Morenoff.

For the first election cycle in quite a while, we finally have quite a few moderates looking to primary the Tea Partiers and Social Democrats. I found some primary polling for Richard Durbin, if he doesn't retire:

Quinnipiac:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Overall, my preference is Kinzinger>Harris>Munger/Lahood(whichever runs)>Durbin>Zopp>Andrzejewski. None of the first four are bad. IMO, Durbin's the best Majority Leader since Bill Frist, and Howard Baker before that.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 11, 2016, 10:15:31 PM »

Why not ask what would have happened if Herman Cain's campaign did not collapse? Roll Eyes
Logged
Mike Thick
tedbessell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,085


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -8.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 11, 2016, 10:37:17 PM »

Post. I'm surprised that King would seek out Villalba, who's a virtual unknown statewide, over someone he's been known to be friends with like McCaul, who can self-fund. I see Villalba as someone who's more likely to run for Governor in 2022 or even Senate to replace Cornyn in 2020. He doesn't strike me as the type to take on an incumbent. In the end, though, I doubt both of them would run, though. We'd end up with a Perot-Cruz runoff, which the establishmentarians would hate.

Harris is a different story. He's very, very ambitious. I can see him running for President in 2024 or 2028 if he knocks out Durbin. It's shocking that Durbin's polling so low, but I don't know why -- progressives loathe the guy.
Logged
NOT gonna be banned soon
Golfman76
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 12, 2016, 05:53:10 PM »

King should really back off of Texas. He has already destroyed Cruz enough in the 2 debates he was in, and the attack ads were brutal. And now funding a primary challenge? In any case, Perot seems to have a good chance. Capturing the Trump Supporters could help him. Villalba also has a good chance with the Hispanics. Also, have you heard the news that a Clinton 2020 movement is starting? Do you think she will accept it?
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 12, 2016, 06:13:59 PM »

No, I think Hillary knows she's been beaten.

As for Napoleon Harris doing best against Durbin, I'm just glad that he and Durbin will hold onto the reformist IL Democrats rather than their Cook County Corruptocrats. It's really hard for me to believe Emanuel got the DNC Chair position, still. I wonder if he plans on backing Zopp or getting someone else to run.


But yeah, Perot would be a pretty decent Senator. He is pro-choice and pro-SSM, like Villalba, so I suspect those two intend on joining forces. Villalba and Perot already are building campaign infrastructure, and Rubio won't object to Cruz being taken out.
Logged
NOT gonna be banned soon
Golfman76
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 14, 2016, 02:13:15 PM »

Ross Perot has said that if his son wins, he will become a Republican.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 13 queries.