No running mate?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:31:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  No running mate?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: No running mate?  (Read 921 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,714
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 12, 2016, 09:21:44 AM »

What if a presidential candidate picks no running mate or the his/her convention does not nominate one? Election goes autmaticly to the Senate floor if the candidate wins the general election?

As far as I know, Martin Van Baren didn't have a VP in 1840. But it didn't matter since he lost the election.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2016, 10:09:06 AM »

What if a presidential candidate picks no running mate or the his/her convention does not nominate one? Election goes autmaticly to the Senate floor if the candidate wins the general election?

As far as I know, Martin Van Baren didn't have a VP in 1840. But it didn't matter since he lost the election.

Electors will still have a chance to vote for a VP. If they coordinate on one person, that person will be VP. If not, it goes to the Senate.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2016, 10:22:58 AM »

Funny thing: you can also have a number of running-mates, varying state by state.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2016, 10:43:42 AM »

Funny thing: you can also have a number of running-mates, varying state by state.

Yep, in fact the individual state parties could even have different presidential candidates running in each state. The Whig party tried this in 1836, hoping that collectively they could win a majority between the several regional candidates and then pick one when the Electoral College convened, but they failed to accumulate enough electoral votes.
Logged
SteveRogers
duncan298
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,186


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2016, 12:08:19 PM »

I'm pretty sure most states' laws require a Vice Presidential candidate to be listed on the ballot, so if the national party didn't pick one, your individual state parties would each pick their own. Obviously if there was no consensus pick it could get thrown to the Senate (which only gets to pick from the top 2 electoral vote recipients for VP).
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2016, 12:57:39 PM »

Funny thing: you can also have a number of running-mates, varying state by state.

Yep, in fact the individual state parties could even have different presidential candidates running in each state. The Whig party tried this in 1836, hoping that collectively they could win a majority between the several regional candidates and then pick one when the Electoral College convened, but they failed to accumulate enough electoral votes.

Also, in 1948 Thurmond was an official Democratic nominee in states he carried. In 1968, Wallace was an official Democratic nominee on Alabama's ballot, with Humphrey being forced to run as "National Democratic".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 11 queries.