"Low Church" vs. "Evangelical" within the context of Anglicanism/Episcpalianism (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:52:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  "Low Church" vs. "Evangelical" within the context of Anglicanism/Episcpalianism (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "Low Church" vs. "Evangelical" within the context of Anglicanism/Episcpalianism  (Read 694 times)
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,502
United States


« on: May 14, 2016, 07:37:33 PM »

So I've been researching the definitions of these two terms on the Internet (always a dangerous thing Tongue) and I was curious about the history of the terms "Low Church" and "Evangelical" within the Anglican/Episcopalian tradition.

As I understand it, at various points in history, "Low Church" has been used as a synonym or equivalent of the terms "Latitudinarian," "Evangelical", or simply Anglican/Episcopalian churches that emphasize simplistic styles of worship and/or the Protestant (especially Reformed) aspects of the Anglican tradition.
However, I am not sure that the above is necessarily correct; I suppose it depends on the time and place that we're talking about.

Anyone else here have any insights on this topic?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.