Reuters junk poll: Clinton up 4, too many undecideds (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:12:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Reuters junk poll: Clinton up 4, too many undecideds (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Reuters junk poll: Clinton up 4, too many undecideds  (Read 1241 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,742


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: May 14, 2016, 11:47:04 PM »

I'm beginning to wonder if Trump will ever lead nationally.  If Reuters won't show him leading, then who will?

Rasmussen has him leading by 2.

Oh right, I forgot about Scotty.  Maybe I should put it this way: will a good pollster ever show him leading?

Define good pollster.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,742


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2016, 12:17:17 AM »

I'm beginning to wonder if Trump will ever lead nationally.  If Reuters won't show him leading, then who will?

Rasmussen has him leading by 2.

Oh right, I forgot about Scotty.  Maybe I should put it this way: will a good pollster ever show him leading?

Define good pollster.

Hm, there aren't too many good ones left, are there?  Monmoth, Marist, and PPP are a few examples of good ones that come to mind.  I'm sure there are more, though.

Maris and Monmouth only have 1 poll each so far this year. PPP has 3. Not looking good with such rare pollsters.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.