°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
Posts: 8,185
|
|
« on: May 16, 2016, 08:03:10 AM » |
|
Yes. I feel 100 confident that everyone should vote yes on both because anyone who is on the ballot in enough states to get to 270 (or more) electoral votes should be taken seriously.
The fact that they aren't makes it appear that they can't be elected and therefore can't reach a decent per cent in polls. They should both be on the ballot everywhere.
How many people, on a totally unrelated topic, will vote "none of these candidates" which is on the ballot in Nevada, a state which leans Democratic, but could be a swing state if a lot of people refuse to vote for Clinton (assuming she wins on June 7, which she has a good chance of doing, or so it would appear) or the presumptive GOP guy?
Prediction: the next POTUS will either be a man or a woman.
|