Democratic KY / OR primary results thread (first polls close at 6pm ET)

[Fargobison]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/732710221001396224

[Eraserhead]

DD HQ is a joke basically. Do they still think Hillary won Michigan?

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

DD HQ is a joke basically. Do they still think Hillary won Michigan?

Or that Bernie won Missouri.

[BundouYMB]

Are we really using DD now? LOL

There's nothing wrong with DD. They're great people and their results have always been 100% reliable.

They made a bad call in Michigan (for totally understandable reasons, imo, but w/e) but there's nothing wrong with the ground work they do.

I doubt DD uses actual returns when it reports results.

DD uses their own returns lol, they don't use AP returns. That's what they are & that's why they're great. They literally have people in count centers who upload the precinct tallies as soon as they're done. This is why they initially outpace AP (they get the results faster than they're officially filed) and later fall behind (they don't have people in literally every count center, so once centers they don't have people in start to report they fall behind.)

They have never reported bad results, ever. Their calls and analysis have been bad at various points, but yeah, their actual work is perfect.

[YPestis25]

MSNBC says it is now too close too call.

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Are we really using DD now? LOL

There's nothing wrong with DD. They're great people and their results have always been 100% reliable.

They made a bad call in Michigan (for totally understandable reasons, imo, but w/e) but there's nothing wrong with the ground work they do.

I doubt DD uses actual returns when it reports results.

DD uses their own returns lol, they don't use AP returns. That's what they are & that's why they're great. They literally have people in count centers who upload the precinct tallies as soon as they're done. This is why they initially outpace AP (they get the results faster than they're officially filed) and later fall behind (they don't have people in literally every count center, so once centers they don't have people in start to report they fall behind.)

They have never reported bad results, ever. Their calls and analysis have been bad at various points, but yeah, their actual work is perfect.

Really?

So why does DDHQ have HILLARY ahead when Bernie has been leading for quite some time and there are MORE votes being reported on CNN than DDHQ? LOL

[Crumpets]

Clinton actually keeping her strong margin in Louisville. That wasn't the case in Indianapolis or Detroit. Maybe a silver lining for her?

[ElectionsGuy]

Sanders wins 16/24 fully counted counties. Looks like its not a rural sweep for him, so it'll be close. Clinton needs to count on Louisville and Lexington to save her. So far strong in Louisville, but that could the most urban parts.

[HAnnA MArin County]

Does anybody not think that these registered Democrats in closed primary states who are voting for Sanders are only doing so to get Trump elected?

[MaxQue]

Are we really using DD now? LOL

There's nothing wrong with DD. They're great people and their results have always been 100% reliable.

They made a bad call in Michigan (for totally understandable reasons, imo, but w/e) but there's nothing wrong with the ground work they do.

I doubt DD uses actual returns when it reports results.

They literally have people in count centers who upload the precinct tallies as soon as they're done.

How naive to believe that.

[BundouYMB]

Are we really using DD now? LOL

There's nothing wrong with DD. They're great people and their results have always been 100% reliable.

They made a bad call in Michigan (for totally understandable reasons, imo, but w/e) but there's nothing wrong with the ground work they do.

I doubt DD uses actual returns when it reports results.

DD uses their own returns lol, they don't use AP returns. That's what they are & that's why they're great. They literally have people in count centers who upload the precinct tallies as soon as they're done. This is why they initially outpace AP (they get the results faster than they're officially filed) and later fall behind (they don't have people in literally every count center, so once centers they don't have people in start to report they fall behind.)

They have never reported bad results, ever. Their calls and analysis have been bad at various points, but yeah, their actual work is perfect.

Really?

So why does DDHQ have HILLARY ahead when Bernie has been leading for quite some time and there are MORE votes being reported on CNN than DDHQ? LOL

Dude, DD has results in from completely different counties in than AP. They have 91% reporting in Fayette, AP has like 5% reporting there. They're different organizations with different people. Even if you have an IQ of like 5 I can't see how you're failing to grasp this.

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Are we really using DD now? LOL

There's nothing wrong with DD. They're great people and their results have always been 100% reliable.

They made a bad call in Michigan (for totally understandable reasons, imo, but w/e) but there's nothing wrong with the ground work they do.

I doubt DD uses actual returns when it reports results.

DD uses their own returns lol, they don't use AP returns. That's what they are & that's why they're great. They literally have people in count centers who upload the precinct tallies as soon as they're done. This is why they initially outpace AP (they get the results faster than they're officially filed) and later fall behind (they don't have people in literally every count center, so once centers they don't have people in start to report they fall behind.)

They have never reported bad results, ever. Their calls and analysis have been bad at various points, but yeah, their actual work is perfect.

Really?

So why does DDHQ have HILLARY ahead when Bernie has been leading for quite some time and there are MORE votes being reported on CNN than DDHQ? LOL

Dude, DD has results in from completely different counties in than AP. They have 91% reporting in Fayette, AP has like 5% reporting there. They're different organizations with different people. Even if you have an IQ of like 5 I can't see how you're failing to grasp this.

How very naive of you to think that DDHQ is a legit organization...I almost feel sorry for you..

[Santander]

Somebody please tell Kornacki how to pronounce Louisville.

[BundouYMB]

Are we really using DD now? LOL

There's nothing wrong with DD. They're great people and their results have always been 100% reliable.

They made a bad call in Michigan (for totally understandable reasons, imo, but w/e) but there's nothing wrong with the ground work they do.

I doubt DD uses actual returns when it reports results.

They literally have people in count centers who upload the precinct tallies as soon as they're done.

How naive to believe that.

Ok, I mean they have 91% reporting in Fayette right now, AP has like 5% reporting there, so you can now watch for yourself as AP reports the exact results they have an hour behind them. I mean, they literally outpace AP and then AP follows with identical numbers, so I can't see how you could possibly think they make numbers up at this point, but whatever.

[BundouYMB]

Again, I'd like to remind anyone implying that DD makes up numbers that DD has outpaced AP in various individual counties in every single state they've covered so far and once AP caught up their numbers were identical, so I have no idea how you could possibly think they make numbers up, but again, whatever.

[Crumpets]

Somebody please tell Kornacki how to pronounce Louisville.

How do you pronounce it? Most people I know from that area say LOO-uh-vull, but I've also heard one person pronounce it LOW-vull.

[yourelection]

Louisville and Lexington very slowin reporting...

[jaichind]

Again, I'd like to remind anyone implying that DD makes up numbers that DD has outpaced AP in various individual counties in every single state they've covered so far and once AP caught up their numbers were identical, so I have no idea how you could possibly think they make numbers up, but again, whatever.

Thanks for this.  I always wondered if DD was legit or not

[jaichind]

Clinton ahead now on CNN

Looks like mostly because of Jefferson dump

[Frodo]

Just about even now with a third of the vote in....  

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Massive vote dump from Louisville

[jaichind]

Massive vote dump from Louisville

Yep, Sanders back up again

[yourelection]

ooops Louisville just dumped a bunch of votes. Were they listening

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Pike county puts Sanders back in the lead after the data dump from Louisville.

[Axel Foley]

Clinton +14 in Jefferson with 41 counted.