Which RCP election map is worse?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 12:39:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Which RCP election map is worse?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: -skip-
#1
Trump v. Clinton
 
#2
Trump v. Sanders
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 34

Author Topic: Which RCP election map is worse?  (Read 695 times)
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 19, 2016, 05:00:12 PM »

Trump v. Clinton:



Trump v. Sanders:

Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2016, 05:16:14 PM »

Trump vs Sanders because of the stupid Utah meme.
Logged
Mallow
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 737
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2016, 05:31:43 PM »

They're both godawful. Utah almost makes the Trump v. Bernie one win out, but having MO, GA, AZ, VA, CO, and NH all in the same category gives the slight edge of horribleness to the Trump v. Clinton map.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2016, 08:26:06 PM »

LOL!!!

Unlike Atlas, these idiots base it off the polls. Send some Atlas #analysts to unskew their State Polls!
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2016, 08:44:29 PM »
« Edited: May 19, 2016, 09:02:22 PM by LLR »

Honestly, besides UT, NJ and NH, these are pretty good. Voted Clinton because of NH and FL as tossups.

EDIT: actually, no, this pretty much sucks.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2016, 08:49:03 PM »

They're both terrible. I don't even know why they bothered to make two of them, since a) Sanders will not be the nominee and b) they barely make any changes anyway.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,203
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2016, 09:49:23 PM »

They're both terrible. I don't even know why they bothered to make two of them, since a) Sanders will not be the nominee and b) they barely make any changes anyway.
Logged
Rick Grimes
Rookie
**
Posts: 94


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2016, 12:20:19 AM »

they are both good but arkansas, nj, and illinois are swing. also expected to see some weird stuff going on in oregon and tennesseee maybe mississippi. rhode island is also a lean clinton but BARLEY according to polls.
Logged
Lachi
lok1999
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,347
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -1.06, S: -3.02

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2016, 05:04:02 AM »

they are both good but arkansas, nj, and illinois are swing. also expected to see some weird stuff going on in oregon and tennesseee maybe mississippi. rhode island is also a lean clinton but BARLEY according to polls.
There is no way that AR, NJ, and IL are going to be swing states this election, the Democrats will easily win IL, and NJ comfortably, while the Republicans will easily win AR. RI is safe Democrat also, no matter what the polls say.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2016, 05:08:26 AM »

The Sanders one. The Clinton one is already overestimating the Democrats, and I don't think Sanders would actually do any better than her.

LOL!!!

Unlike Atlas, these idiots base it off the polls. Send some Atlas #analysts to unskew their State Polls!

I don't think they've started using the polls for their maps yet.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2016, 05:49:19 AM »

LOL!!!

Unlike Atlas, these idiots base it off the polls. Send some Atlas #analysts to unskew their State Polls!

Let me guess. You think Clinton has a real chance at winning Utah?
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,127
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2016, 02:16:03 PM »
« Edited: May 20, 2016, 02:19:00 PM by IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi »

New Jersey Lean Democrat at the same time Utah is tossup.

Ok, let's just get this out there. Trump polls worse in MS than in UT. If he's losing UT, MS is gone.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 20, 2016, 04:46:36 PM »

LOL!!!

Unlike Atlas, these idiots base it off the polls. Send some Atlas #analysts to unskew their State Polls!

Let me guess. You think Clinton has a real chance at winning Utah?

It tilts/leans R, and Trump probably wins by 5-10. However, I'm not one of our famed analysts who called the "Dan Jones-UT: Clinton+6(?)" trash and then called Dan Jones the Utah gold standard when it projected Trump +13.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,719
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 20, 2016, 06:06:16 PM »

New Jersey Lean Democrat at the same time Utah is tossup.

Ok, let's just get this out there. Trump polls worse in MS than in UT. If he's losing UT, MS is gone.

Polls right now are all over the place, and won't really stabilize until after the conventions.

Also, Georgia is more winnable for Democrats than Utah. Obviously.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 15 queries.