Could Arkansas be a battleground state?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 02:36:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Could Arkansas be a battleground state?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Could Arkansas be a battleground state?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Maybe
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 99

Author Topic: Could Arkansas be a battleground state?  (Read 2662 times)
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,241


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 21, 2016, 05:26:25 AM »

Will Donald Trump's nomination and Hillary Clinton's nomination as well as Bill Clinton's heritage make Arkansas a battleground state in the General Election on November 8 2016?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,437
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2016, 05:42:03 AM »

Lol no.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2016, 05:42:34 AM »

Will Donald Trump's nomination and Hillary Clinton's nomination as well as Bill Clinton's heritage make Arkansas a battleground state in the General Election on November 8 2016?

Bill himself couldn't make Arkansas competitive these days.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,059
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2016, 05:48:54 AM »

Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2016, 05:49:26 AM »

Maybe if liberals and conservatives actually have a shooting war as some psychics predict.  For a Presidential election, no.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2016, 05:50:52 AM »

Will Donald Trump's nomination and Hillary Clinton's nomination as well as Bill Clinton's heritage make Arkansas a battleground state in the General Election on November 8 2016?

Bill himself couldn't make Arkansas competitive these days.

God Himself couldn't make Arkansas competitive these days.
Logged
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,241


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2016, 05:54:22 AM »

Maybe with Hillary's centrist views that are not pleasing Sanders' supporters.
Logged
Unimog
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 453
Namibia


Political Matrix
E: -3.00, S: -2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2016, 06:49:46 AM »

Is there another Hillary Clinton or another Arkansas or what?

No.
Logged
Podgy the Bear
mollybecky
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,975


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2016, 06:58:54 AM »

Times have changed.  To see the massive swing away from two well regarded centrist Democratic Senate incumbents (Lincoln in 2010, Pryor in 2014) is remarkable.  Amazing to see what has happened in Arkansas in such a short time.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,261
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2016, 07:11:17 AM »

Could your mum be a battleground state though
Logged
beaver2.0
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,777


Political Matrix
E: -2.45, S: -0.52

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2016, 07:44:12 AM »

No.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2016, 08:23:50 AM »

MS, and LA are more likely to flip than Arkansas, surprisingly.
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,715
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2016, 09:55:02 AM »

MS, and LA are more likely to flip than Arkansas, surprisingly.

Very true.

This is because Arkansas has the lowest black population of any Southern state and it's white population is mostly Scots-Irish folks, even now.

I can't emphasize enough how the Democrats' slide amongst white voters is not uniform.  It is the white Scot-Irish folks, many of whom live in the South and Border states, that have produced a disproportionate number of defections from the Democratic ranks at all levels.  These voters have certain qualities that drive this.  One is that they are, disproportionately, living in places where coal is a big deal.  But that's only part of it.  Another is that these folks disproportionately are churchgoers, own guns, and have a socially conservative outlook on all issues, even when they are economically liberal.  An additional factor is that these folks are intensely patriotic; they produce a huge percentage of America's soldiers and sailors. 

Underscoring all of this is that these folks have a minimal sense of ethnic identity.  They view themselves as "Americans", pure and simply.  They don't really view themselves as Scottish or Irish; they identify themselves as Americans, and their roots in this country go back to Colonial days.  They have never looked with favor on appeals to folks as hyphenated Americans, and, as such, are not likely to look with favor on the kind of racial, ethnic, and gender politics the Democratic Party has used to boost its majorities. 

These are the folks that are driving the GOP trends in WV, TN, KY, MO, AR, and in the mountain regions of VA and NC.  Virginia's "Fighting 9th" CD was once a liberal district that elected a liberal Democrat; now, it's all the way with the GOP and not likely to switch back.  If this hadn't happened, VA would be out of reach for the GOP today to the point where it would be at the level of MI in the Democratic column.  These are the folks that have made MO and AR solid GOP at all levels.  Of all these areas, only MO shows any sort of possible pathway back for the Democrats.
Logged
Gabagool102
Rookie
**
Posts: 244
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2016, 10:14:54 AM »
« Edited: May 21, 2016, 10:16:39 AM by Gabagool102 »

Could your mum be a battleground state though

Gave me a good chuckle m8.
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2016, 10:20:19 AM »

If there was a conservative third-party ticket, I'd say yes.
But unfortunately there isn't, so Utah is more likely to vote Democrat than is Arkansas.
Logged
Angrie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2016, 10:36:20 AM »

Arkansas will probably vote similarly to Utah. If Clinton wins by enough to win Utah (maybe by 10-15 points nationally), then she could win Arkansas as well.
Logged
Coolface Sock #42069
whitesox130
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,695
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: 2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2016, 12:02:48 PM »

LOL, no.
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2016, 12:15:56 PM »

Arkansas and Alabama will both be key battleground states if Trump drops out of the race a week before election day.
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,831


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2016, 12:22:29 PM »

If it was 1996 lol.
Logged
Gabagool102
Rookie
**
Posts: 244
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 21, 2016, 12:23:42 PM »

Will Donald Trump's nomination and Hillary Clinton's nomination as well as Bill Clinton's heritage make Arkansas a battleground state in the General Election on November 8 2016?

Depends, if Clinton pour's some money into it, then it could become competitive.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 21, 2016, 01:34:04 PM »

Of course not. A better question is would Ark. trend Democrat due to Hillary and Bill's roots. Probably barely, though it's the kind of place Trump would overperform.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 21, 2016, 01:36:32 PM »

I think Clinton could win a 40-state landslide and still lose Arkansas.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,886
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 21, 2016, 01:48:05 PM »

No, it willbe TRUMP territory.
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 21, 2016, 02:40:30 PM »

With the right running mate, it could become competitive.
Think of Brian Schweitzer, Joe Manchin, Tim Kaine or Brad Henry; they would make Arkansas viable.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,886
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 21, 2016, 02:42:34 PM »

With the right running mate, it could become competitive.
Think of Brian Schweitzer, Joe Manchin, Tim Kaine or Brad Henry; they would make Arkansas viable.

I doubt it. Willard won it with over 60%. No way Hillary wins here, just because Bill was governor twenty-five years ago. Too many conservatives and evangelicals.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 15 queries.