Democrats are surprisingly NOT dependent on minority votes to win (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:34:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democrats are surprisingly NOT dependent on minority votes to win (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democrats are surprisingly NOT dependent on minority votes to win  (Read 3108 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« on: May 21, 2017, 02:57:32 PM »

Are african Americans not minorities? Romney won the white vote in almost every state outside of Washington Oregon Iowa and New England. And maybe Delaware. Democrats are absolutely dependent on minority voters to push them over the top.

Yes. Obviously Democrats do need some votes from minorities to win, in particular from African Americans.

The point is that many fewer votes from minorities are needed than one would probably presume. So much so that with drastically reduced minority turnout (including ZERO Hispanic turnout and ZERO Asian turnout), Hillary could lose the popular vote by several points and still win the electoral college. That's the central point. It seems surprising to me, but that's what the demographics and the numbers are.

Back when the electoral college was a good thing!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.