Should birth control be socialized? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:30:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should birth control be socialized? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should birth control be socialized?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: Should birth control be socialized?  (Read 4962 times)
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« on: June 13, 2005, 07:09:12 PM »

Yes, of course birth control should be 'socialized', as well as all other medical care.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2005, 07:23:58 PM »

Change the subject question to: "Should I be able to have sex at the taxpayer's expense?"

Everyone should answer no, haha.

It has nothing to do with 'having sex at the taxpayer's expense'.  The sex may be paid, or free, or have emotional costs, but in any case all of these are paid by you.  The state should merely provide medical care, for obvious reasons.  Public health is not an individual matter, but rather one of managing things like pregnancy and transmission of various diseases through the population.  A society with provision of free medical care, free STD treatment, and birth control methods will be a much healthier one.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2005, 03:53:25 PM »

Change the subject question to: "Should I be able to have sex at the taxpayer's expense?"

Everyone should answer no, haha.

It has nothing to do with 'having sex at the taxpayer's expense'.  The sex may be paid, or free, or have emotional costs, but in any case all of these are paid by you.  The state should merely provide medical care, for obvious reasons.  Public health is not an individual matter, but rather one of managing things like pregnancy and transmission of various diseases through the population.  A society with provision of free medical care, free STD treatment, and birth control methods will be a much healthier one.

Perhaps Medicare should be extended to cover prostitutes. After all, the mental health of the elderly is at stake.

I do think that generous pensions should be provided for the elderly, and welfare for the poor, that might enable them to purchase some (legalized) sexual services if they economized in other areas.  However as a medical treatment it should be confined to those who have an actual medical problem such as impotence or some psychological problem relating to their sexual functioning, such as female fridgitidy.  This would probably be better treated by psychologists than prostitutes, though I think there would be some role for 'sexual surrogates' here.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2005, 05:00:10 PM »

If you can't afford condoms you don't have sex. Quite simple.

^^^^

Why not just have sex anyway?  Or better yet if you're female, have sex with johns for money - and he'll pay you and buy the condom (or pay extra to not use one) Wink    Sure beats working at WalMart.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.