Would Bernie have performed better had he actually competed in the South? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 03:20:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Would Bernie have performed better had he actually competed in the South? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: skip
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: Would Bernie have performed better had he actually competed in the South?  (Read 1474 times)
Young Conservative
youngconservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,029
United States


« on: May 25, 2016, 09:36:34 PM »

Yeah Sanders outspent Clinton in SC, made plenty of campaign stops, had some local endorsements, and had many more field offices. He still lost by 50%.
See but South Carolina is a harder state because the Clintons have amazing organization and history there. He should've competed harder in tennessee, arkansas, virginia, north carolina, and georgia where he would've lost but reduced the delegate deficit substantially
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 15 queries.