CA: PPIC: Harris, Sanchez going to runoff
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 10:49:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  CA: PPIC: Harris, Sanchez going to runoff
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CA: PPIC: Harris, Sanchez going to runoff  (Read 919 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 25, 2016, 11:13:37 PM »

Article.

Harris (D) - 27%
Sanchez (D) - 19%
Del Beccaro (R) - 8%
Unz (R) - 6%
Sundheim (R) - 3%
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2016, 02:02:34 AM »

There has been hilariously little movement in this race through all of the polling.
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,041
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2016, 03:28:30 AM »

Come on, Loretta! Smiley
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2016, 12:22:27 PM »

I hope whichever of Harris/Sanchez loses comes back in 2018, assuming DiFi retires.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2016, 12:27:50 PM »

I hope whichever of Harris/Sanchez loses comes back in 2018, assuming DiFi retires.

Plenty of other CA Democrats I would prefer to see over Sanchez.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,661
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2016, 02:01:38 PM »

What's kinda funny is even if you add up the top three Republican's numbers it still doesn't match Sanchez's number in the poll....lol.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2016, 02:07:03 PM »

California Republicans should be ashamed. If Kevin Faulconer had ran, this race may have been different.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2016, 04:14:29 PM »

California gets what they deserve. Expect low turnout (in the general)
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2016, 05:17:21 PM »

"Likely D" - Cook
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2016, 06:05:12 PM »

Poling for the General
Kamala Harris 34%
Loretta Sanchez 26%
Would not vote 24%
Undecided 15%

http://www.ppic.org/main/pressrelease.asp?p=2053
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 27, 2016, 03:02:27 PM »

This being the Year of Trump, I think we'll see Latino turnout boost dramatically, which makes the race Advantage Sanchez.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 27, 2016, 09:47:23 PM »

I think people overestimate how much Republicans will care to look at Sanchez/Harris' positions and realize which one is more conservative. A lot of them will just vote for who they recognize, or maybe just leave it blank.

Also the idea that "Anti-PC" is now a voting bloc that matters and can win Sanchez votes is laughable.


My prediction: Harris starts out leading, and never looks back.
Logged
rob in cal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,984
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2016, 10:55:45 AM »

  One reason California has never had an Hispanic senator is because until the last few decades they were a small percentage of the electorate, and an even smaller share of influential people who would be the types to become senators.  Add in the fact that we have the Feinstein/Boxer monopoly for 25 years and it totally makes sense, as they have held the seats during the emergence of the Hispanic plurality in California.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 13 queries.