What, generally, would a "large-scale climate-engineering project" consist of,
typically, climate engineering means either getting the earth to reflect more sunlight (by making the surface brighter, injecting things into the atmosphere, etc.) or by reäbsorbing carbon dioxide (e.g. by planting new trees).
the latter, of course, ignores the effects of methane and other greenhouse gases – which doesn't mean, of course, that we shouldn't do it, but it would be an insufficient measure (as you can see by the fact that such programs already exist on a large scale worldwide). the method of releasing large amounts of substance into the atmosphere or ocean, meanwhile, comes with all sorts of side effects and legal entanglements.
my bill would have funded a
space sunshade program, which would send lenses to the l1 lagrange point between the sun and the earth to deflect a percentage of incoming light. there is the disadvantage of substantially larger requirements of cost and time, but in my opinion it's more than worth it.
absolutely. in fact, as i said, many such measures are already in place, it's just that they affect atlasia only, and not the other 85% of global emissions.