Northern Regional Committee discussion thread

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Personally, I'd rather we not have an Lt.G and maybe give Wiki responsibilities to the Speaker and make them first in the succession line (followed by the most senior Assembly member), which I believe we ended up doing two or so years ago.  The Lt.G position just isn't sexy enough for people to take it on willingly.

I also think five is an ideal number for the Assembly.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

I think having a referendum is an acceptable compromise, even if it's (ugh) NYC.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

If the committee goes back on a decision and decide not to decide, maybe they could let voters decide other aspects, like how the assembly is elected. There were different proposals for that and the committee doesn't seem to backtrack on that decision.

I read about a bill that exists in private and the committee should try to discuss as much as possible in public so citizens know what is going on. Also a bill sounds like legislating which the commitee can't do. 

A bill isn't being voted on.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

The bill, essentially, is what I've been proposing for the last week or so on the capital referendum.  I didn't want to post it publicly because I didn't want to give the impression that it's legislation we're voting on (which it's not); merely a suggestion for how the referendum process should play out.  I apologize for any misunderstandings; I'll just post the full proposal for scrutiny:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

With this bill we'd have to wait for the Governors election wouldn't we?

Yes.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

That bill simply authorizes the referendum process.