Single Day Primary vs Current System (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:12:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  Single Day Primary vs Current System (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Single Day Primary vs Current System  (Read 6970 times)
RaphaelDLG
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,687
United States


WWW
« on: June 16, 2016, 01:58:22 AM »

A disadvantage of the current system that no one mentioned is that it makes states like Iowa and New Hampshire and also the ST states obscenely powerful, and states like New Jersey and New Mexico basically irrelevant.

I would prefer a staggered primary calendar similar to the current one, but where the order of states is determined by lottery - for instance, one year California's primary would be randomly selected for February, four years later, it'd be in June.  Have a third party certify the lottery results like the NBA Draft.

A top-two runoff primary like others have mentioned is an acceptable option, but it still puts too much of an emphasis on fundraising and name recognition.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.