OR-Clout Research: Clinton low energy; Oregon wants to make America great again
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 07:02:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  OR-Clout Research: Clinton low energy; Oregon wants to make America great again
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: OR-Clout Research: Clinton low energy; Oregon wants to make America great again  (Read 7649 times)
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 28, 2016, 09:34:55 PM »

I just have StatesPoll on ignore, but sadly the rest of you quoting him forces me to read his posts.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,450
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: May 28, 2016, 09:41:42 PM »

Yawn.  BTW, it looks like the primary pollster for "Clout Research" is Fritz Wenzel, of the awful, super R biased Wenzel Strategies, which produced gems like this in 2012:  http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/wenzel-strategies-r-citizens-united-16430.

I do think Hillary can underperform Obama in Oregon, perhaps depending on the level of support Bernie gives to Hillary.  But she is no danger of losing the state except in an 7-10 point Trump landslide.

Absolutely agree that Oregon will not be a swing state in 2016, and that it would something like a Trump landslide to flip the state.... s**t the state hasn't voted Republican since 1984, even then it was only an 8 point Reagan win when he was winning 60-40!

My major concern is with the erosion of Democratic downstate support over the past few decades, and anyone that thinks that Obama style margins will continue in Multnomah County forever is living in a world of illusion when Metro-Portland only accounts for a little over 50% of the statewide vote.

That being said, I can easily see Hillary only winning Oregon 54-46 or 53-47 with a national win of 51-49 or 52-48.



Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,489
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: May 28, 2016, 10:24:16 PM »

I wonder how much stronger Bernie is here...
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: May 28, 2016, 10:27:57 PM »

Clout had Trump with a 2 point lead over Cruz in Indiana. Enough said.

Even I am not enough of a partisan hack to believe this. OR is the NJ of the West. You can't pump your own gas and every cycle, there's always one poll claiming it's going to be close.... then reality sets in.
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: May 28, 2016, 10:33:35 PM »


And I could have gone out with a supermodel tonight. Except I didn't.

If Oregon is a swing state, Trump has this thing wrapped up before the polls even close there on Election Night.
Logged
Coolface Sock #42069
whitesox130
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,695
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: 2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: May 28, 2016, 10:33:55 PM »

Garbage until proven otherwise. Even Monica Wehby led in a poll once.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,075


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: May 28, 2016, 11:03:51 PM »

Well, Hillary did poll really terribly here in 2008 along with Colorado. I doubt Trump wins here but she won't win in a blowout like Obama.
Logged
bumpercrop
Rookie
**
Posts: 49


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: May 28, 2016, 11:32:30 PM »

Hahaha total junk like the 2014 WEHBY IN THE LEAD! poll
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: May 28, 2016, 11:38:41 PM »

New Poll: Oregon President by Other Source on 2016-05-13

Summary: D: 42%, R: 44%, U: 13%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: May 28, 2016, 11:57:09 PM »

Wow, Trump really has such wide appeal, he's even making Oregon close! He must be a really cool guy, since those hipsters in Portland seem to like him a lot.
Logged
Lachi
lok1999
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,351
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -1.06, S: -3.02

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: May 29, 2016, 02:24:47 AM »

Guys, this was also the polling company who said that the Indiana GOP Primary was going to be a dead heat...

http://cloutpolitical.com/new-poll-indiana-gop-contest-a-total-toss-up/

When in fact Trump won by 17 points
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: May 29, 2016, 02:34:38 AM »

It's happening...

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=237673.0
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,896
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: May 29, 2016, 06:16:33 AM »

Hillary, you've been trumped.
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: May 29, 2016, 07:25:06 AM »

Is there any reason why you posted that three times?

Bad internet
Logged
Gabagool102
Rookie
**
Posts: 244
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: May 29, 2016, 08:29:38 AM »

Liberals Right now


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YVrxFmheSc
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: May 29, 2016, 08:39:20 AM »


Im not clicking the link but I assure you, a poll in May from a no name pollster with questionable connections is not making liberals lose sleep. Trump aint winning Oregon just like Romney wasnt winning Connecticut.
Logged
Gabagool102
Rookie
**
Posts: 244
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: May 29, 2016, 08:47:39 AM »


Im not clicking the link but I assure you, a poll in May from a no name pollster with questionable connections is not making liberals lose sleep. Trump aint winning Oregon just like Romney wasnt winning Connecticut.



But when liberals were saying Utah will go for clinton based on polls from march it's ok?
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: May 29, 2016, 08:51:15 AM »


Im not clicking the link but I assure you, a poll in May from a no name pollster with questionable connections is not making liberals lose sleep. Trump aint winning Oregon just like Romney wasnt winning Connecticut.



But when liberals were saying Utah will go for clinton based on polls from march it's ok?

I can only assume most posters were skeptical.
Logged
StatesPoll
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 441
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: May 29, 2016, 09:08:48 AM »


Im not clicking the link but I assure you, a poll in May from a no name pollster with questionable connections is not making liberals lose sleep. Trump aint winning Oregon just like Romney wasnt winning Connecticut.

The Difference

1. Romney never took the leads in Connecticut(during whole year 2012)
Rasmussen(500 LV) October 7, 2012 Barack Obama    51%    Mitt Romney    45%        
it was his best Poll in CT. he was usually behind 15~20%ish to Obama

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early/Mid_2012_statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Connecticut
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Connecticut


2. TRUMP beat Hillary with +2.2% Margins.
TRUMP 44.4% | Hillary 42.2%  (Oregon, 5/10-5/13, 657 RV)




Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: May 29, 2016, 09:13:55 AM »


Im not clicking the link but I assure you, a poll in May from a no name pollster with questionable connections is not making liberals lose sleep. Trump aint winning Oregon just like Romney wasnt winning Connecticut.

The Difference

1. Romney never took the leads in Connecticut(during whole year 2012)
Rasmussen(500 LV) October 7, 2012 Barack Obama    51%    Mitt Romney    45%        
it was his best Poll in CT. he was usually behind 15~20%ish to Obama

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early/Mid_2012_statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Connecticut
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Connecticut


2. TRUMP beat Hillary with +2.2% Margins.
TRUMP 44.4% | Hillary 42.2%  (Oregon, 5/10-5/13, 657 RV)





Just like Romney won Michigan when according to a poll he was up by one.

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2012/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=2620120605055

Take your ignorant self out of here before you make a even bigger fool of yourself.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: May 29, 2016, 09:15:15 AM »


Im not clicking the link but I assure you, a poll in May from a no name pollster with questionable connections is not making liberals lose sleep. Trump aint winning Oregon just like Romney wasnt winning Connecticut.

The Difference

1. Romney never took the leads in Connecticut(during whole year 2012)
Rasmussen(500 LV) October 7, 2012 Barack Obama    51%    Mitt Romney    45%        
it was his best Poll in CT. he was usually behind 15~20%ish to Obama

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early/Mid_2012_statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Connecticut
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Connecticut


2. TRUMP beat Hillary with +2.2% Margins.
TRUMP 44.4% | Hillary 42.2%  (Oregon, 5/10-5/13, 657 RV)






Romney was down 2 in Connecticut in a PPP poll.
Logged
StatesPoll
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 441
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: May 29, 2016, 09:22:39 AM »


Im not clicking the link but I assure you, a poll in May from a no name pollster with questionable connections is not making liberals lose sleep. Trump aint winning Oregon just like Romney wasnt winning Connecticut.

The Difference

1. Romney never took the leads in Connecticut(during whole year 2012)
Rasmussen(500 LV) October 7, 2012 Barack Obama    51%    Mitt Romney    45%        
it was his best Poll in CT. he was usually behind 15~20%ish to Obama

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early/Mid_2012_statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Connecticut
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Connecticut


2. TRUMP beat Hillary with +2.2% Margins.
TRUMP 44.4% | Hillary 42.2%  (Oregon, 5/10-5/13, 657 RV)






Romney was down 2 in Connecticut in a PPP poll.

ah this one

PPP (D)   9/22 - 9/25   592 RV   4.0   Obama   47    Romney   45   Obama +2

but he still didn't win!  (TRUMP won)
That's the difference.

Logged
Mike Thick
tedbessell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,085


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -8.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: May 29, 2016, 09:25:13 AM »


Im not clicking the link but I assure you, a poll in May from a no name pollster with questionable connections is not making liberals lose sleep. Trump aint winning Oregon just like Romney wasnt winning Connecticut.

The Difference

1. Romney never took the leads in Connecticut(during whole year 2012)
Rasmussen(500 LV) October 7, 2012 Barack Obama    51%    Mitt Romney    45%        
it was his best Poll in CT. he was usually behind 15~20%ish to Obama

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early/Mid_2012_statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Connecticut
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Connecticut


2. TRUMP beat Hillary with +2.2% Margins.
TRUMP 44.4% | Hillary 42.2%  (Oregon, 5/10-5/13, 657 RV)






Romney was down 2 in Connecticut in a PPP poll.

ah this one

PPP (D)   9/22 - 9/25   592 RV   4.0   Obama   47    Romney   45   Obama +2

but he still didn't win!  (TRUMP won)
That's the difference.



No.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: May 29, 2016, 11:02:05 AM »

I see some posters have learned nothing from Overtime (which I just noticed is defunct.)
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: May 29, 2016, 11:04:32 AM »


If we keep adding junky fly by night partisan pollsters into the database, the map is going to look even more nonsensical than it already does. Tongue
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 12 queries.