Minnesota/Iowa/Wisconsin (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:36:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Minnesota/Iowa/Wisconsin (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Minnesota/Iowa/Wisconsin  (Read 730 times)
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,989
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

« on: May 28, 2016, 11:07:58 PM »

The media is lumping these 3 states in with Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan when talking about midwest. Does anyone else think Trump will underperform in these 3 states? The Wisconsin polls are not very promising for Trump at all and no one has polled Iowa recently but the January polls were not terribly friendly for Trump either.
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,989
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2016, 11:29:16 AM »

I think this is really Trump's best and possibly only path to 270

Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,989
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2016, 09:02:26 PM »

The Scandanavian influence in WI/MN/IA helps Dems this time around. Trump does better with the Appalachian crowd that identifies as "American." I don't consider Michigan really in play this time around, not with Dems winning that open senate seat easily in 2014 and Obama by nearly 10 last time. PA is really hard for the GOP too, they really need both a huge gain in western PA without a decline in metro Philly. Places like Chester and Berks could easily swing back to the Dems from 2012, especially Chester where Romney was a good fit.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.