#BernieForPrison2016?

[Lyin' Steve]

Could all three of the remaining presidential contenders be criminals by the end of the year?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/313932605/Toensing-Letter-to-Senator-Sanders-Re-Burlington-College-Documents

If Bernie used the power of his office on behalf of his wife to improperly pressure a bank into approving a loan Burlington College would have never been able to pay back, and then the college paid a lot of money to his wife, he's in deep trouble.  Is this why she's spent two months pretending to not be able to find his tax returns?

[Lief 🗽]

BEAUTIFUL! I hope the Clinton Justice Department throws him in jail for this.

[NOVA Green]

Could all three of the remaining presidential contenders be criminals by the end of the year?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/313932605/Toensing-Letter-to-Senator-Sanders-Re-Burlington-College-Documents

If Bernie used the power of his office on behalf of his wife to improperly pressure a bank into approving a loan Burlington College would have never been able to pay back, and then the college paid a lot of money to his wife, he's in deep trouble.  Is this why she's spent two months pretending to not be able to find his tax returns?

Ok... Lyin' Steve. Always liked most of your posts and contributions to the forum, however the thread title appears to be an excessively provocative angle that doesn't in any way shape or form appear to resemble anything definitive, nor a logical argument as to why this may possibly potentially be the case come end of December 2016.

Please explain in detail why Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders could potentially be criminals by the end of 2016?

Between your provocative title, that appear to be nothing but yet another anti-Bernie hack job, I want you to explain why you think that all three remaining presidential candidates might be criminals by the end of the year. Do you know something that the rest of us don't know? Please explain....

Call me confused in Oregon....

[NOVA Green]

BEAUTIFUL! I hope the Clinton Justice Department throws him in jail for this.

Well, call some of your friends on the Clinton campaign, and they might just oblige in the event she somehow manages to win in November...

[Lyin' Steve]

Could all three of the remaining presidential contenders be criminals by the end of the year?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/313932605/Toensing-Letter-to-Senator-Sanders-Re-Burlington-College-Documents

If Bernie used the power of his office on behalf of his wife to improperly pressure a bank into approving a loan Burlington College would have never been able to pay back, and then the college paid a lot of money to his wife, he's in deep trouble.  Is this why she's spent two months pretending to not be able to find his tax returns?

Ok... Lyin' Steve. Always liked most of your posts and contributions to the forum, however the thread title appears to be an excessively provocative angle that doesn't in any way shape or form appear to resemble anything definitive, nor a logical argument as to why this may possibly potentially be the case come end of December 2016.

Please explain in detail why Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders could potentially be criminals by the end of 2016?

Between your provocative title, that appear to be nothing but yet another anti-Bernie hack job, I want you to explain why you think that all three remaining presidential candidates might be criminals by the end of the year. Do you know something that the rest of us don't know? Please explain....

Call me confused in Oregon....

It's a tongue-in-cheek reference to #HillaryForPrison, I don't actually think any of our lovely candidates has much chance of being convicted of a crime.

If he actually did pressure the bank to loan his wife money, though, that's pretty damn unethical.  Jane Sanders isn't fooling anyone on the tax returns.

[NOVA Green]

Could all three of the remaining presidential contenders be criminals by the end of the year?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/313932605/Toensing-Letter-to-Senator-Sanders-Re-Burlington-College-Documents

If Bernie used the power of his office on behalf of his wife to improperly pressure a bank into approving a loan Burlington College would have never been able to pay back, and then the college paid a lot of money to his wife, he's in deep trouble.  Is this why she's spent two months pretending to not be able to find his tax returns?

Ok... Lyin' Steve. Always liked most of your posts and contributions to the forum, however the thread title appears to be an excessively provocative angle that doesn't in any way shape or form appear to resemble anything definitive, nor a logical argument as to why this may possibly potentially be the case come end of December 2016.

Please explain in detail why Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders could potentially be criminals by the end of 2016?

Between your provocative title, that appear to be nothing but yet another anti-Bernie hack job, I want you to explain why you think that all three remaining presidential candidates might be criminals by the end of the year. Do you know something that the rest of us don't know? Please explain....

Call me confused in Oregon....

It's a tongue-in-cheek reference to #HillaryForPrison, I don't actually think any of our lovely candidates has much chance of being convicted of a crime.

If he actually did pressure the bank to loan his wife money, though, that's pretty damn unethical.  Jane Sanders isn't fooling anyone on the tax returns.

ok... got it, apologies for taking that bait and not having a sense of humor.

That being said, Libertarian and Green are sounding awful tasty come November Harvest Season.

[Maxwell]

It's worth that Toensing either refers to Brady Toensing, Vice Chair for the Vermont Republican Party, or Victoria Toensing, the GOP's #BENGHAZI lawyer. Either way, take this with a mountain of salt.

Let's be fair here.

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

Fine, put all of 'em in jail and lets run Johnson vs Stein

[Ebsy]

It's worth that Toensing either refers to Brady Toensing, Vice Chair for the Vermont Republican Party, or Victoria Toensing, the GOP's #BENGHAZI lawyer. Either way, take this with a mountain of salt.

Let's be fair here.

It's the former.

[This account no longer in use.]

I thought this might actually be something interesting when I clicked the thread title.

Guess I was wrong.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Even if there is nothing in this story, is anyone here who doubts that the right-wing noise machine will make a huge fuss out of it? Heck, they managed to make the e-mail nonsense look like the second coming of Watergate.
That goes to those who believe that it won't be easy for Sanders' favorables to crumble during a GE campaign. 

[This account no longer in use.]

This doesn't seem to be anywhere on the news, though.

[dax00]

Somebody please find solid grounds for #CruzForPrison, so I no longer have to worry about a delegate ninja strike on the RNC nomination (aka the nuclear option).

[Lyin' Steve]

Somebody please find solid grounds for #CruzForPrison, so I no longer have to worry about a delegate ninja strike on the RNC nomination (aka the nuclear option).

The undisclosed GS loan!

[Phony Moderate]

Every effort being made here to unite the Democratic Party.

[Holmes]

Sanders' first taste of a right-wing smear?

[Chief Justice Keef]

lmao

[Santander]

I love how a humble, concerned Catholic parishioner hired a K St law firm to represent her in this matter.