The South will rise again.

[Adam Griffin]

It's been so long since this game has had controversial bitch-fests that many people don't know when or how to just enjoy things. Sad!

[Associate Justice PiT]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Then where's the beef? If the party is so prolife, why haven't they introduced a prolife bill yet?

Why don't the prolife bills come first?

     Believe me, I am fully expecting to see a pro-life bill come down the pike soon.

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You'll have to deliver something pretty soon. So far all the bills that have been up have been Labor bills.

[Classic Conservative]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You'll have to deliver something pretty soon. So far all the bills that have been up have been Labor bills.

Really, I suppose you haven't seen The Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2016 and The Currency Tactile Feature Act and The Capital Punishment Abolition Admendment and Freedom to Donate Act of 2016. You are really sounding dumb, Ben. You should be familiar with the facts.

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

The Currency Tactile Feature act was extensively modified by NeverAgain to make Atlasian bills look like plastic.

Seems like a Labor bill to me.

[Classic Conservative]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

The Currency Tactile Feature act was extensively modified by NeverAgain to make Atlasian bills look like plastic.

Seems like a Labor bill to me.

So there are still three others on the floor.

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Cap punishment, which you opposed, may I say, that you are now arguing is a Fed bill?

Freedom to Donate has serious problems.

So that leaves one bill, the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist designation act.

[Wisconsin+17]

One Fed bill, the rest neutral bills and two, that are wholly unsupportable. I don't really see how I'm getting much bang for my vote, Classic.

Pretty sad that out of 5 bills, only one is any good. 1/5 is a terrible batting average. You're below the Mendoza line.

You do know, classic, that I literally have a prolife bill written up all ready to go?

[Classic Conservative]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Cap punishment, which you opposed, may I say, that you are now arguing is a Fed bill?

Freedom to Donate has serious problems.

So that leaves one bill, the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist designation act.

A federalist introduced it, so it's a federalist bill.

[Classic Conservative]

One Fed bill, the rest neutral bills and two, that are wholly unsupportable. I don't really see how I'm getting much bang for my vote, Classic.

Pretty sad that out of 5 bills, only one is any good. 1/5 is a terrible batting average. You're below the Mendoza line.

You do know, classic, that I literally have a prolife bill written up all ready to go?

Then tell your new found friend, Evergreen to introduce it. That would be nice.

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I guess the bloom is off that love affair...

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Why then, are you not supporting it, and the man I just voted for Southern Governor, did?

 
 

[Classic Conservative]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Why then, are you not supporting it, and the man I just voted for Southern Governor, did?

Because, I don't have to support every bill a federalist puts up, I'm a member of congress and I have free will. Ben, I don't think you understand how any of this works tbh.

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Ok. So you say that we should all support Federalists except when we believe our free will tells us not to?

[Classic Conservative]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Ok. So you say that we should all support Federalists except when we believe our free will tells us not to?

What, I'm talking about bills and then you change the subject entirely.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

if classic conservative isn't ideologically pure enough, i wonder who is…?

[Wisconsin+17]

Unlike a certain senator who will remain unnamed, the ranch will remain open to everyone! I even have some refreshments.

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I know, right? Just goes to show that you never really do know a man.

[This account no longer in use.]

Ben, if you really feel this way about the Federalist Party, then why are you jumping ship to join the even more liberal Labor Party? Seems rather hypocritical to me.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

lol

[Anna Komnene]

It sure is nice being indie in times like these.    Who cares what party Ben wants to join?

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I could stay home, but flipping my vote makes it twice as effective.

A protest vote would be wasted, but a vote for Labor ensures that the Feds who support this nonsense go out.

[Mike Thick]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I could stay home, but flipping my vote makes it twice as effective.

A protest vote would be wasted, but a vote for Labor ensures that the Feds who support this nonsense go out.

...and that Laborites who support the same policies, in addition to more that you disagree with, go in.

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sure. And then when the Federalists get tired of losing they'll have a decision to make.

If I choose to support the party then I reward and reinforce bad behavior.

Muzzling socons is not cool. Muzzling socons who are running *for* you as a candidate? Really?

I find it sad that the party is so fixated on satisfying evergreen, that they would dump on someone who is actually helping and voting for them. Hello.

Labor is always going to own this issue. If people want a party that supports this, they will vote Labor. Why would they bother to support the Federalists when they can support Labor?

[Mike Thick]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sure. And then when the Federalists get tired of losing they'll have a decision to make.

If I choose to support the party then I reward and reinforce bad behavior.

Muzzling socons is not cool. Muzzling socons who are running *for* you as a candidate? Really?

I find it sad that the party is so fixated on satisfying evergreen, that they would dump on someone who is actually helping and voting for them. Hello.

Labor is always going to own this issue. If people want a party that supports this, they will vote Labor. Why would they bother to support the Federalists when they can support Labor?

I'm sorry, but the idea that helping Laborites get elected, and thus helping them implement liberal policies, somehow helps advance conservatism in any way (short-term or long-term) is completely beyond me.