SD-Targeted Persuasion: Clinton +3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 17, 2024, 11:54:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  SD-Targeted Persuasion: Clinton +3
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: SD-Targeted Persuasion: Clinton +3  (Read 5251 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 31, 2016, 02:24:33 AM »

Also, FWIW, Benchmark is predicting Sanders will win 57-43.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,456
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: May 31, 2016, 02:50:56 PM »

It could be accurate. I think South Dakota and New Mexico will probably be the closest states on 6/7. I'm hoping Sanders pulls it off just for the sake of the final primary map.

New Mexico will be a closed primary where almost half the voters will be minorities. I don't see how it will be close unless the state's Hispanics vote radically different compared to those in Texas and Arizona.

Keep in mind that Obama lost hispanics in New Mexico by 62%-36% in 2008 and still basically tied Clinton. I expect Clinton to win but it'll probably be within single digits.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,677
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: May 31, 2016, 03:04:21 PM »

Also, FWIW, Benchmark is predicting Sanders will win 57-43.

Oh yes, them. The ones who predicted Clinton would win Rhode Island.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: May 31, 2016, 03:06:32 PM »

Also, FWIW, Benchmark is predicting Sanders will win 57-43.

Oh yes, them. The ones who predicted Clinton would win Rhode Island.

Well, if they're off by the same amount here, that would either mean Sanders winning by 1 or 27.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,788
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: May 31, 2016, 03:06:44 PM »

It could be accurate. I think South Dakota and New Mexico will probably be the closest states on 6/7. I'm hoping Sanders pulls it off just for the sake of the final primary map.

New Mexico will be a closed primary where almost half the voters will be minorities. I don't see how it will be close unless the state's Hispanics vote radically different compared to those in Texas and Arizona.

Keep in mind that Obama lost hispanics in New Mexico by 62%-36% in 2008 and still basically tied Clinton. I expect Clinton to win but it'll probably be within single digits.

That wasn't a primary.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,456
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: May 31, 2016, 03:22:01 PM »

It could be accurate. I think South Dakota and New Mexico will probably be the closest states on 6/7. I'm hoping Sanders pulls it off just for the sake of the final primary map.

New Mexico will be a closed primary where almost half the voters will be minorities. I don't see how it will be close unless the state's Hispanics vote radically different compared to those in Texas and Arizona.

Keep in mind that Obama lost hispanics in New Mexico by 62%-36% in 2008 and still basically tied Clinton. I expect Clinton to win but it'll probably be within single digits.

That wasn't a primary.

It was labeled by some as a caucus but the actual format was that of a closed primary. Even Leip lists it as a primary.

https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=2008&fips=35&f=0&off=0&elect=1
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 07, 2016, 08:22:06 PM »

We are not worthy.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 07, 2016, 09:09:42 PM »

https://twitter.com/benchmarkpol/status/740355844353593345

SABATO Crystal Ball predicted a Clinton win too.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: June 07, 2016, 09:32:21 PM »

Gold standard in South Dakota I guess?
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,835
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: June 07, 2016, 11:23:56 PM »

Wow, they nailed it!
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: June 08, 2016, 12:20:09 AM »

I hope that they release a GE poll in SD, and show Clinton up by 3. Tongue
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: June 08, 2016, 12:21:16 AM »

Here are all of their other polls: http://www.targetedpersuasionpolls.com/#!public-polls/szoo1

They've only done 5 other states, but they've gotten the right candidate all 5 times (Sanders in Indiana, Rhode Island, and West Virginia and Clinton in Kentucky and Connecticut).

Looks like we may have a good new pollster on our hands. Very impressive.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,788
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: June 08, 2016, 01:45:11 AM »

Better than Quinnipiac.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.