Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 20, 2013, 07:31:58 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Atlas Fantasy Elections
Atlas Fantasy Elections
(Moderators:
Gustaf
,
MasterJedi
)
Pacific Constitutional Convention
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Author
Topic: Pacific Constitutional Convention (Read 5483 times)
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56721
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #25 on:
July 03, 2005, 12:42:07 pm »
Never noticed any in the Pacific.
Of course, no Pacific Governors or Lt's race ever had more than two candidates...
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Support Tahiti!
TheWildCard
YaBB God
Posts: 4574
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #26 on:
July 03, 2005, 02:45:34 pm »
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on July 03, 2005, 12:42:07 pm
Never noticed any in the Pacific.
Of course, no Pacific Governors or Lt's race ever had more than two candidates...
That is true. Though I think we still should consider this for the future when gubernatorial races could become more competitive.
Logged
No more McShame
FuturePrez R-AZ
YaBB God
Posts: 1095
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #27 on:
July 04, 2005, 07:48:49 pm »
I personally like IRV. That said, if someone comes up with a better idea, I would be open to hear them out.
Logged
Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.31
My political view's summarized
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29274
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #28 on:
July 04, 2005, 07:50:07 pm »
Quote from: Senator FuturePrez on July 04, 2005, 07:48:49 pm
I personally like IRV. That said, if someone comes up with a better idea, I would be open to hear them out.
IRV is good, but Condorcet is better.
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56721
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #29 on:
July 05, 2005, 06:22:47 am »
Or I could live with Borda.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Support Tahiti!
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
YaBB God
Posts: 9424
Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #30 on:
July 05, 2005, 10:46:29 pm »
I support keeping IRV/Preferential voting. I thinks its the only reasonable system for a multi party country that also wants an executive branch. Its either IRV or the Louisiana system I'm afraid. Borda and Condorcet may not be easy enough for new people to pick up. If someone wants to make a sales pitch to me on Condorcet or Borda, I'm open to changing my mind.
Logged
Quote from: Scam of God on December 24, 2009, 11:27:46 am
Shut you hole... Conservatism is dead. I hope I get to see your head paraded on a pike with it.
Emsworth
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 9124
Political Matrix
E: 8.32, S: -7.22
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #31 on:
July 06, 2005, 10:44:01 am »
I think that Louisiana-style runoff voting would be fine. IRV would also be okay.
Another question we need to consider is this: should the Lt. Governor be elected on the same ticket as the Governor, or should he be elected separately, or should he be appointed?
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56721
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #32 on:
July 06, 2005, 11:08:18 am »
Separately elected. I don't see a reason why not.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Support Tahiti!
Emsworth
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 9124
Political Matrix
E: 8.32, S: -7.22
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #33 on:
July 06, 2005, 11:38:44 am »
I've started writing a draft for the Constitution, but I do have a question before I proceed.
We seem to have decided that we will have a Legislature consisting of all the citizens. Do the delegates feel that the Governor should also be a member? My personal view is that the Governor should not be a member, to maintain the separation of powers. The Governor presumably holds veto power anyway.
The same applies to the Lt. Governor, although we could make him or her the presiding officer of the Legislature with a tie-breaking vote.
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56721
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #34 on:
July 06, 2005, 11:42:58 am »
Keep it short and don't worry with "chairmen" of the "legislature" is my advice.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Support Tahiti!
Emsworth
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 9124
Political Matrix
E: 8.32, S: -7.22
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #35 on:
July 13, 2005, 10:26:51 am »
I have prepared a draft of the Constitution for discussion:
Preamble
We the People of Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Oregon, California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and Hawaii, in order to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do hereby ordain and establish this Constitution for the Pacific Region of Atlasia.
Article I
Section 1: Governor and Lieutenant Governor
1. The executive power shall be vested in a Governor and a Lieutenant Governor of the Pacific.
2. No person except a citizen of the Pacific with at least one hundred posts shall be Governor or Lieutenant Governor.
3. Before entering into the exercise of his or her duties, the Governor and the Lieutenant Governor shall each take the following oath: "I solemnly swear [affirm] that I will faithfully execute the office of Governor [Lieutenant Governor] and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitutions of Atlasia and the Pacific Region, so help me Dave."
4. The Governor shall take care that the laws of the Pacific are faithfully executed.
Section 2: General elections
1. General elections to the offices of Governor and Lieutenant shall be held in the months of March, July, and November.
2. Elections shall begin at midnight Pacific Standard Time on the penultimate Friday of a month, and shall conclude exactly seventy-two hours later.
3. Elections for Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall be separate and by preferential voting, and may be regulated by law.
4. The Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall take office at noon Pacific Standard Time on the first Friday following the election.
Section 3: Special elections
1. If the office of Governor falls vacant, the Lieutenant Governor shall become Governor.
2. If the office of Lieutenant Governor falls vacant, a special election for the office shall begin on the first Friday after the vacancy, and shall conclude seventy-two hours thereafter.
3. If the offices of Governor and Lieutenant Governor are vacant simultaneously, special elections for both shall begin on the first Friday after the vacancy arises, and shall conclude seventy-two hours thereafter.
4. The Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall take office immediately upon the conclusion of the special election.
5. Special elections shall be conducted in the same manner as a general election, according to clause 4 of section 2 of this article.
Article II
Section 1: Legislation
1. Any citizen may propose a bill to the Pacific Region.
2. The People shall vote on each bill that has been signed by a total of three citizens, or by the Governor, within one week of being proposed.
3. A referendum on each bill shall begin at a time determined by the Governor (but not more than one month and not less than one day after it obtains the required signatures) and shall remain open for one week.
4. If a majority of those voting approve, the bill shall become law, unless vetoed by the Governor within one week of passage.
5. The Governor may not veto any bill approved by at least two-thirds of those voting.
Section 2: Recalls
1. Any citizen may propose the recall of the Governor or Lieutenant Governor to the Pacific Region.
2. The People shall vote on each recall petition that has been signed by a total of five citizens within one week of being proposed.
3. A referendum on each recall petition shall begin one day after it obtains the required signatures and shall remain open for one week.
4. If at least two-thirds of those voting approve, the official named in the recall petition shall cease to hold office immediately.
Section 3: Constitutional Amendments
1. Any citizen may propose a constitutional amendment to the Pacific Region.
2. The People shall vote on each proposed constitutional amendment that has been signed by a total of five citizens, or by the Governor, within one week of being proposed.
3. A referendum on each constitutional amendment shall begin at a time determined by the Governor (but not more than one month and not less than one day after it obtains the required signatures) and shall remain open for one week.
4. If two-thirds of those voting approve, the proposed article of amendment shall be deemed a valid part of the Constitution.
Article III
[Bill of Rights]
Article IV
[Mechanism for ratification]
I have left the Bill of Rights and the mechanism for ratification to the convention itself.
«
Last Edit: July 13, 2005, 11:12:34 am by Emsworth
»
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56721
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #36 on:
July 13, 2005, 10:48:33 am »
Quote from: Emsworth on July 13, 2005, 10:26:51 am
#Before entering into the exercise of his or her duties, the Governor and the Lieutenant Governor shall each take the following oath: "I solemnly swear [affirm] that I will faithfully execute the office of Governor [Lieutenant Governor] and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitutions of Atlasia and the Pacific Region, so help me Dave."
We didn't use to have an oath of office... I don't
object
to one, just thought I'd point it out.
Quote
#The Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall take office at noon Pacific Standard Time on the first Friday following the election.
We used to take office as soon as results were certified. Of course, this was unproblematic only because there never were any election disputes.
Quote
#If the office of Lieutenant Governor falls vacant, the Governor may appoint a Lieutenant Governor.
having drafted the amendment to get the Lt.Gov. elected in a by-election administered by the Gov. in case of a vacancy, I am of course fond of and attached to it.
Quote
#If the offices of Governor and Lieutenant Governor are vacant simultaneously, special elections for both shall begin on the first Friday after the vacancy arises, and shall conclude seventy-two hours thereafter.
This one's a change I heartily agree with. I don't know if anybody save me ever noticed, but under current law there would have been two by-elections on following weekends. I noticed that during my presidential campaign. It was a reason not to even think about appointing Wildcard to the cabinet...
Now here we get to the serious beef...
Quote
#The People shall vote on each proposed constitutional amendment that has been signed by a total of five citizens, or by the Governor, within one week of being proposed.
#A referendum on each constitutional amendment shall begin at a time determined by the Governor (but not more than one month and not less than one day after it obtains the required signatures) and shall remain open for one week.
#If two-thirds of those voting approve, the proposed article of amendment shall be deemed a valid part of the Constitution.
Under current Pacific law, amendments followed the exact same procedure as any old bill, and while it did make for an unreadable constitution as time passed, it also made for a very flexible instrument and served to avoid all those horrible legalistic arguments that have been plaguing Atlasia for months.
In fact, since there was no practical difference between laws and amendments anyways, some amendments were not even named "amendment" (the "Welcome Montana Act", off the top of my head). Nobody ever complained.
Which brings me to another minor quibble, btw: We had that list of member states at the beginning of the old constitution. I'd like to see that retained.
You also left out (intentionally or unintentionally?, honest question here) the Lt.Gov.'s duties.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Support Tahiti!
Emsworth
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 9124
Political Matrix
E: 8.32, S: -7.22
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #37 on:
July 13, 2005, 11:05:54 am »
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on July 13, 2005, 10:48:33 am
We used to take office as soon as results were certified. Of course, this was unproblematic only because there never were any election disputes.
Yes, I thought about that as well. The possibility of disputes led me to delay the office-taking.
Quote
having drafted the amendment to get the Lt.Gov. elected in a by-election administered by the Gov. in case of a vacancy, I am of course fond of and attached to it.
That's fine; I'll amend the draft accordingly.
Quote
Under current Pacific law, amendments followed the exact same procedure as any old bill, and while it did make for an unreadable constitution as time passed, it also made for a very flexible instrument and served to avoid all those horrible legalistic arguments that have been plaguing Atlasia for months.
If the Constitution is as easily amendable as any other law, it seems to lose its value as the fundamental document of the region. We could, however, reduce the required majority to three-fifths if you prefer.
Quote
We had that list of member states at the beginning of the old constitution. I'd like to see that retained.
That's fine.
Quote
You also left out (intentionally or unintentionally?, honest question here) the Lt.Gov.'s duties.
Intentionally. I thought that it would be simpler just for the Governor to informally specify the Lt Gov's duties.
«
Last Edit: July 13, 2005, 11:13:14 am by Emsworth
»
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56721
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #38 on:
July 13, 2005, 11:22:23 am »
Well, currently he was some sort of "judicial authority" - never sure how far reaching that was exactly; and he was the supervisor of elections. You see it was a sort of separation of powers - the Governor had the veto, the shortcut to the ballot, and of course the say in federal redistricting; the Lt.Gov. was supposed to have the more administrative stuff. I think some US states' admins work similarly.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Support Tahiti!
Platypus
hughento
YaBB God
Posts: 20916
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #39 on:
July 13, 2005, 04:32:32 pm »
keep preferential voting
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
YaBB God
Posts: 7530
Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #40 on:
July 13, 2005, 04:35:32 pm »
What do you guys think of the idea of preferential voting, but you can only preference half of the people on the ballot? We could make an exception for that if there an odd number of people, you would round down the number of people one can preference (for example, if there were 7 candidates, you could preference 3). Except, in the case of three candidates, one can preference two.
Logged
Michael Bloomberg for President.
Lol Winfield. This quote is from a thread entitled "what do the following proceed to do if they are not nominated?"
Quote from: Tammany Hall Republican on January 07, 2008, 11:45:07 pm
Romney - President of Harvard
Platypus
hughento
YaBB God
Posts: 20916
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #41 on:
July 13, 2005, 04:41:21 pm »
that means the system is ineffective in reaching it's primary aim; to ensure that any candidate that is elected is elected with the support of a majority. Atlasia already goes against this ideal, but your idea would make it worse. The option to rank all candidates must at least be available, if not compulsory.
Logged
Lt. Gov. Immy
Immy
YaBB God
Posts: 741
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #42 on:
July 13, 2005, 05:47:16 pm »
Quote from: Lewis Trondheim on July 13, 2005, 11:22:23 am
Well, currently he was some sort of "judicial authority" - never sure how far reaching that was exactly; and he was the supervisor of elections. You see it was a sort of separation of powers - the Governor had the veto, the shortcut to the ballot, and of course the say in federal redistricting; the Lt.Gov. was supposed to have the more administrative stuff. I think some US states' admins work similarly.
I agree. I beleive that the Lt. Governor's powers should be enumerated and that they should be as follows:
1) Conducting elections
2) Presiding over the legislature and voting in the case of ties only
I think we should determine what exactly "judical authority" is and if we want that power concentrated in the hads of the Lt. Governor or if we wanted to creat another position like some other regions have done.
Logged
Economic: -5.50
Social: -6.31
Emsworth
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 9124
Political Matrix
E: 8.32, S: -7.22
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #43 on:
July 13, 2005, 06:29:59 pm »
The Constitution proposed does maintain preferential voting, btw.
I'm inclined to agree with Lewis Trondheim; specifying that the Lt. Governor is the "chairman" of the Legislature is not necessary, and adds too many unneeded complications. Aside from judicial authority, I don't think that further duties should be specified; flexibility is preferable in such matters.
Logged
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
Posts: 22421
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #44 on:
July 13, 2005, 06:39:56 pm »
Quote from: Emsworth on July 13, 2005, 10:26:51 am
Article III
[Bill of Rights]
A Bill of Rights in the regional constitution might be a bad idea as it could declare the entire constitution as unconstitutional if the Senate writes a contradicting clause into the federal.
Logged
Emsworth
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 9124
Political Matrix
E: 8.32, S: -7.22
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #45 on:
July 13, 2005, 06:47:25 pm »
Quote from: Senator A.J.* King IV on July 13, 2005, 06:39:56 pm
A Bill of Rights in the regional constitution might be a bad idea as it could declare the entire constitution as unconstitutional if the Senate writes a contradicting clause into the federal.
Just because one part of the regional Constitution violates the federal Constitution, the whole regional Constitution does not become invalid. Only the part that violates the federal Constitution is invalid; everything else remains perfectly intact.
Logged
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 21958
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #46 on:
July 13, 2005, 08:03:31 pm »
Having taken a look at Emsworth's draft, I have some suggestions to make on the Preamble and Section I.
Preamble
We the People of
Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Oregon, California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and Hawaii
the Pacific Region
, in order to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do hereby ordain and establish this Constitution for the Pacific Region of Atlasia.
Article I
Section 1: Governor and Lieutenant Governor
1. The executive power shall be vested in a Governor and a Lieutenant Governor of the Pacific.
2. No person except a citizen of the Pacific with at least one hundred posts
since becoming a citizen of the Pacific
shall be Governor or Lieutenant Governor.
3. Before entering into the exercise of his
or her
duties, the Governor and the Lieutenant Governor shall each take the following oath: "I solemnly swear [affirm] that I will faithfully execute the office of Governor [Lieutenant Governor] and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitutions of Atlasia and the Pacific Region, so help me Dave."
4. The Governor shall take care that the laws of the Pacific are faithfully executed.
Section 2: General elections
1. General elections to the offices of Governor and Lieutenant shall be held in the months of March, July, and November.
2. Elections shall begin at midnight Pacific Standard Time on the penultimate Friday of a month, and shall conclude exactly seventy-two hours later.
3. Elections for Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall be separate and by preferential voting, and may be regulated by law.
4. The Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall take office at noon Pacific Standard Time on the first Friday following the election.
Section 3: Special elections
1. If the office of Governor falls vacant, the Lieutenant Governor shall become Governor.
2. If the office of Lieutenant Governor falls vacant, a special election for the office shall begin on the first Friday after the vacancy, and shall conclude seventy-two hours thereafter.
3. If the offices of Governor and Lieutenant Governor are vacant simultaneously, special elections for both shall begin on the first Friday after the vacancy arises, and shall conclude seventy-two hours thereafter.
4. The Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall take office immediately upon the conclusion of the special election.
5. Special elections shall be conducted in the same manner as a general election, according to clause 4 of section 2 of this article.
Logged
Quote from: Grumps on June 04, 2013, 12:14:06 pm
Is Dave Leip real?
Read
Fat Man on a Diet
, an alternate history in which atomic weapons have less bang.
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56721
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #47 on:
July 14, 2005, 07:18:40 am »
Quote from: Emsworth on July 13, 2005, 06:29:59 pm
The Constitution proposed does maintain preferential voting, btw.
I'm inclined to agree with Lewis Trondheim; specifying that the Lt. Governor is the "chairman" of the Legislature is not necessary, and adds too many unneeded complications. Aside from judicial authority, I don't think that further duties should be specified; flexibility is preferable in such matters.
I urge you to include the supervising of elections as his duty.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Support Tahiti!
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56721
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #48 on:
July 14, 2005, 07:20:44 am »
Um, Ernest. He just edited in the list of states.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Support Tahiti!
Emsworth
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 9124
Political Matrix
E: 8.32, S: -7.22
Re: Pacific Constitutional Convention
«
Reply #49 on:
July 14, 2005, 07:34:33 am »
What does the Convention think about appointing a separate judge to resolve disputes, etc.?
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...