Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 01:02:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 ... 47
Author Topic: Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)  (Read 66849 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #650 on: June 07, 2016, 11:15:34 PM »

Sanders is ahead in Sanders country, MT!

edit: Damnit, realisticidealist.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,711
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #651 on: June 07, 2016, 11:16:07 PM »

LOL. Someone has hacked into Steve Kornacki's big board! Purple heart
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #652 on: June 07, 2016, 11:16:35 PM »

This was my prediction map I made right after the Iowa Caucus


Blue-Clinton
Red-Sanders

I actually didn't do too badly.
Good job predicting IN and WV, although you had missed most of the caucuses.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #653 on: June 07, 2016, 11:17:18 PM »
« Edited: June 07, 2016, 11:21:22 PM by IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi »

Montana has flipped to Sanders. First time that has happened tonight.

With the North Dakota loss that makes it 51 states that Hillary has lost in contested primaries - a record for a successful nominee. Montana may make number 52.
Logged
yourelection
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 436


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #654 on: June 07, 2016, 11:19:36 PM »

With 11% in already in CA, Clinton maintains a respectiable 62% to 36% lead. This may still change, but still a little surprising.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #655 on: June 07, 2016, 11:20:22 PM »

Montana has flipped to Sanders. First time that has happened tonight.

ohp
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #656 on: June 07, 2016, 11:21:07 PM »

Does anyone know what's up with Bernalillo County NM? CNN has it with a Bernie lead and over 70K total votes, and 86% reporting. NYT has it with a Clinton lead with only about 60K votes and 100% reporting.
Logged
BundouYMB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 910


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #657 on: June 07, 2016, 11:21:25 PM »

Montana flipped because most of Missoula came in. But none of Yellowstone (Billings) is in yet. Could easily flip back to Clinton.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #658 on: June 07, 2016, 11:22:04 PM »

So has New Jersey stopped counting votes for the rest of the night?
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #659 on: June 07, 2016, 11:22:15 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

CA is done.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #660 on: June 07, 2016, 11:23:10 PM »

New Mexico, despite being called, has gotten closer. 51.6-48.4 Clinton right now.
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #661 on: June 07, 2016, 11:23:48 PM »
« Edited: June 07, 2016, 11:26:29 PM by john cage bubblegum »

Looks like we got a dump of precincts in Missoula.  Only a 60-37 margin is not what Sanders was hoping for there.  This thing could be very close, and Clinton is very much in play.  I was expecting a very close race in SD with a Clinton tilt; but I was not expecting this result in Montana.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #662 on: June 07, 2016, 11:24:07 PM »

Since the cities in MT (other than Missoula) are still only reporting "early results", I'd be surprised if the percentages didn't move in Sanders' favor. He'll probably still win MT, but by much less than he should have. He underperformed everywhere except NM and ND.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #663 on: June 07, 2016, 11:24:47 PM »

New Mexico, despite being called, has gotten closer. 51.6-48.4 Clinton right now.

It would be hilarious if he does better in New Mexico than South Dakota.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #664 on: June 07, 2016, 11:25:39 PM »

How can NM be 98% reporting when Santa Fe hasn't been counted except the early vote?

98% of precincts
Logged
RR1997
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #665 on: June 07, 2016, 11:25:47 PM »

This was my prediction map I made right after the Iowa Caucus


Blue-Clinton
Red-Sanders

I actually didn't do too badly.
Good job predicting IN and WV, although you had missed most of the caucuses.

Keep in mind that I made this map when Clinton had a huuuuuge lead over Sanders nationwide.

Michigan was a state that really surprised me. I know that Bernie is a perfect fit for a lot of working-class whites in the state, but I expected Clinton to win due to black voters.
Logged
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #666 on: June 07, 2016, 11:26:03 PM »

CBS news: Clinton "likely" to win California LOL
Way to be on the cutting edge CBS!
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #667 on: June 07, 2016, 11:26:26 PM »

Dang, Albuquerque is now for Sanders. He probably could've pulled off an upset here if he had campaigned more. Why is it so much more favorable for him than AZ? Is it just age?
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #668 on: June 07, 2016, 11:26:45 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Santa Fe is out - that will shift back to Clinton.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #669 on: June 07, 2016, 11:26:49 PM »

If you look at the NM SoS's page, only 28% of precincts statewide are completely reported.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #670 on: June 07, 2016, 11:27:37 PM »

RR1997: This was my prediction in Jan 21 2016


https://uselectionatlas.org/PRED/PRESIDENT/2016D/pred.php?id=329&action=indpred&s=submit
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,439
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #671 on: June 07, 2016, 11:27:41 PM »

Ok... not saying that Sanders will win Cali, but honestly there is a major over reaction to early VbM results  that were always expected to overwhelmingly favor Hillary.

For example early votes show Hillary winning Marin 63-36 and Sonoma 55-44 and SF 37-62, not even to speak elsewhere in the state.

These numbers are definitely impressive with early "vote-banking" and it looks like there is a decent chance that Hillary will win the state, but I ask those of you that are not residents of West Coast and heavily VbM states to automatically assume that the initial results that we are seeing is anywhere close to the final results.
Logged
Bojack Horseman
Wolverine22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,370
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #672 on: June 07, 2016, 11:28:41 PM »

Tammy Duckworth has just unveiled this site: https://trumporkirk.com
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #673 on: June 07, 2016, 11:29:49 PM »

Also, Sanders has taken a strong lead in Oglala Lakota County, SD
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #674 on: June 07, 2016, 11:30:48 PM »

WTF. Why are there always so many errors and changes on these election nights? The vote transferring and reporting process really needs to be cleaned up in some places.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 ... 47  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 13 queries.