Battleground ad buys: Clinton spends in 8 states
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 02:36:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Battleground ad buys: Clinton spends in 8 states
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Battleground ad buys: Clinton spends in 8 states  (Read 1741 times)
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 15, 2016, 06:01:00 PM »

Hillary Clinton placed ad buys with money from her own campaign (not her PAC money) in the following states:

Florida
Ohio
Virginia
New Hampshire
Iowa
Nevada
Colorado
North Carolina

She has not bought ads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan as of yet (to play defense) or in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana and Missouri (to go further on the offensive).

https://twitter.com/mmurraypolitics/status/743189266595975169
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2016, 06:03:03 PM »


She must be looking good there. She probably leads there by more than what the public polling is saying
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2016, 06:06:27 PM »


She must be looking good there. She probably leads there by more than what the public polling is saying

NH looks way better for her, though, and she's still wasting spending money there.

Remember Clinton is stronger with base Democrats than unreliable Sanders-type independents. Pennsylvania has a far higher percentage of base Democrats statewide than New Hampshire
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2016, 06:16:16 PM »


She must be looking good there. She probably leads there by more than what the public polling is saying

NH looks way better for her, though, and she's still wasting spending money there.

Hurting Ayotte so she has a stronger Senate.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2016, 06:27:10 PM »

Democratic margins in PA the last 6 elections:

2012: 5.4%
2008: 10.3%
2004: 2.5%
2000: 4.2%
1996: 9.2%
1992: 9.0%

It's just an incredibly hard state for the GOP to flip with a built-in Democratic advantage in Philly and Pittsburgh. It's also very inelastic with a low percentage of swing voters.

On the other hand, the New Hampshire margins:

2012: 5.5%
2008: 9.6%
2004: 1.6%
2000: -1.2% (Bush won it)
1996: 10%
1992: 1.2%

NH has voted to the right of PA in 4 of the last 6 elections and had virtually the same 2012 margin. It also does not have a built-in minority vote that is reliably Democratic. Clinton can simply run a base campaign to win PA but needs independents to win NH
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2016, 07:15:06 PM »

Keep in mind that this doesn't mean she'll only ever spend in these states. It's probably that these are her biggest priorities in a close election. I'm surprised she's concerned about Nevada, but it might be that Democrats want to make sure that they can hold their most vulnerable senate seat, and possibly pick up 1-2 house seats.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2016, 07:47:34 PM »

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/clinton-to-unleash-tv-hell-on-trump-224399

In omitting Pennsylvania, Michigan, or Wisconsin from the buy while including North Carolina, a state Obama won in 2008 but not 2012, the Clinton campaign joins Priorities — which this month added North Carolina to its buy — in implying that it doesn’t believe the Trump argument that he can win over sufficient numbers of Rust Belt, working class white males to reset the map.
Logged
RaphaelDLG
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,687
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2016, 07:53:34 PM »

I think this is a great list except for the omission of Pennsylvania.  Clinton is significantly favored there, but it has so many EVs, is trending R, and has an important Senate race.  Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona are a waste of money for now.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2016, 08:59:48 PM »

I think this is a great list except for the omission of Pennsylvania.  Clinton is significantly favored there, but it has so many EVs, is trending R, and has an important Senate race.  Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona are a waste of money for now.

Not Arizona because McCain is in a mortal struggle to retain his Senate seat and said in a private fundraiser that he will be in the fight of his political life. Trump is a big drag on him in AZ and Latino voters there are waiting in big numbers to turn out against him
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2016, 10:01:07 PM »

I think this is a great list except for the omission of Pennsylvania.  Clinton is significantly favored there, but it has so many EVs, is trending R, and has an important Senate race.  Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona are a waste of money for now.

I somewhat agree, but at this time it is appropriate to omit Pennsylvania.
trump is currently doing horrible, so the Hillary campaign is probably waiting for future Penn polls, before deciding on any spending there.
Logged
Illiniwek
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,920
Vatican City State



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 15, 2016, 10:03:39 PM »

Looking good to me!
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 15, 2016, 11:15:58 PM »

Including NH/NV but but PA is odd.
Logged
RJEvans
MasterRegal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 15, 2016, 11:26:08 PM »

ABC says it's a six-week, 8-figure buy.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-launches-massive-general-election-ad-blitz/story?id=39887789

If that's true, for six weeks Priorities USA will spend $20m+ to attack Trump and Hillary for America will spend $10m+ on improving Clinton's image. $30m+ for Clinton, a couple of million for Trump, perhaps?
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,060
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 15, 2016, 11:31:39 PM »

Including NH/NV but but PA is odd.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 15, 2016, 11:35:37 PM »

I hate almost everything about this general election.
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,041
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 16, 2016, 12:56:30 AM »
« Edited: June 16, 2016, 12:58:01 AM by Bitch is the New Birkenstock »

NC instead of AZ is a bit surprising to me.  That, combined with the exclusion of PA and inclusion of NV tells me that they are seeing something very different in their internal polling.  Trump massively overperformed in resort areas (except for Orlando) in the primary almost regardless of the local demographics.  Perhaps they are seeing something disconcerting in Vegas?

Trump probably threatened to close his businesses in Vegas or forced the CEOs to tell their employees that they would be out of a job if they didn't vote for him, and then told the CEOs that they would be fired, too.

He does have Chris Christie at his side, after all. Paging Bridget Anne Kelly.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 16, 2016, 01:54:32 AM »

I'm guessing that Arizona isn't on here because it's less of a priority. North Carolina is definitely more winnable, and while Hillary could potentially win Arizona if she clobbers Trump, it's definitely going to stay Republican in a competitive race. Same goes for the senate race: It'll only flip if Democrats are crushing Republicans nationally, and have already gained 5-6 senate seats. It won't be the tipping point race.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 16, 2016, 03:11:47 AM »

I hate almost everything about this general election.

The current President had a tough act to undo. The next President has a tough act to follow.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 16, 2016, 01:21:47 PM »

The Democratic Convention in Philly, plus the first Obama-Clinton campaign stop being in Green Bay next week, might explain the lack of PA and WI buys. As for Michigan, they probably don't think it's something to worry about right now.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 16, 2016, 01:26:52 PM »
« Edited: June 16, 2016, 01:38:43 PM by HillOfANight »

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/first-read-clinton-begins-battleground-ad-blitz-n593566
https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/743497266833547264
Nate Cohn of NYT wonders why she's not investing in some swing state cities... Comments say she's trying to win indies, not the base.

Virginia: $1.6 million (6/16-7/25)
Norfolk: $553K
Richmond: $536K
Roanoke: $261K
Tri-Cities: $77K
Harrisonburg: $55K
Parkersburg: $47K
Charlottesville: $44K
Wheeling: $24K

Ohio: $1.3 million (6/16-6/27)
Cleveland: $580K
Cincinnati: $393K
Dayton: $159K
Youngstown: $121K
Wheeling: $42K

Iowa: $1 million (6/16-7/25)
Des Moines: $430K
Cedar Rapids: $413K
Omaha: $155K
Ottumwa: $37K

Colorado: $926K (6/16-7/4)
Denver: $729K
Colorado Springs: $198K

New Hampshire: $764K (6/16-7/25)
Boston (Manchester): $764K

Florida: $563K (6/16-6/27)
West Palm Beach: $318K
Mobile: $156K
Panama City: $89K

North Carolina: $723K (6/14-6/27)
Raleigh: $409K
Greensboro: $160K
Greenville: $154K

Nevada: $473K (6/16-7/4)
Reno: $246K
Las Vegas: $227K (6/28-7/4 only)
Logged
Angel of Death
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,411
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 16, 2016, 01:37:04 PM »


Wow, she's more in with the memers than one might think.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 16, 2016, 02:36:49 PM »

Very strategically sound on the part of Hillary and the Democrats.

Light years ahead of the Republican Presidential campaign which has as yet to raise significant funds and even start serious campaigning strategically in swing states.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 16, 2016, 05:06:17 PM »

A Morning Consult poll from a few months ago showed Trump leading Clinton (and outperforming other Republicans) in NV, for what it's worth.

Polls in NV are notoriously terrible though.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 17, 2016, 10:04:51 AM »
« Edited: June 17, 2016, 10:08:06 AM by HillOfANight »

https://twitter.com/mmurraypolitics/status/743819167455903744
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/first-read-ryan-instructs-republicans-follow-their-conscience-trump-n594291

Clinton's battleground ad blitz is now up to $17M

Ohio: $4.5 million
North Carolina: $3.6 million
Florida: $3 million
Virginia: $1.8 million
Nevada: $1.6 million
Colorado: $1.1 million
Iowa: $1.1 million
New Hampshire: $830k
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,754
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: June 17, 2016, 10:09:15 AM »

They're really pushing hard in North Carolina. Could either mean their numbers are lower than they want them to be, or they're high and they want to maintain them throughout the summer and into the fall.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 12 queries.