Your response to this lovely map
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 03:46:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Your response to this lovely map
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Your response to this lovely map  (Read 879 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 20, 2016, 08:46:26 PM »

I know there are a lot of these, but what if conventional wisdom took a beating in this election and...

Clinton won Ohio, while losing Pennsylvania.
She also won North Carolina, while losing Virgina.
She won Iowa, while losing Wisconsin.
She won Utah, while losing Arizona.

Also, Happy South Dakota Farmers FTW



How would you react, other than waking up, of course?
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2016, 09:08:00 PM »

Wonder how South Carolina didn't flip!
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2016, 09:16:33 PM »

This map is so unrealistic! You should flip Florida, Georgia and North Carolina.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2016, 10:05:11 PM »

This map is so unrealistic! You should flip Florida, Georgia and North Carolina.

And New Jersey and Arkansas.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,635
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2016, 10:08:45 PM »

Trump is not winning WI under any circumstances. There is nothing to indicate he could possibly win there. At least the SD delusion is grounded in her primary performances.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2016, 10:19:17 PM »

At this point, when proceeding with coloring the map, one may as well as alternate with the red-and-blue hues…just for the hell of it.

North Dakota—blue. South Dakota—red. Nebraska—blue. Kansas—red. Oklahoma—blue. Texas—red.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2016, 10:28:28 PM »

At this point, when proceeding with coloring the map, one may as well as alternate with the red-and-blue hues…just for the hell of it.

North Dakota—blue. South Dakota—red. Nebraska—blue. Kansas—red. Oklahoma—blue. Texas—red.

I like this one.  This one is pretty.

Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 20, 2016, 11:15:46 PM »

At this point, when proceeding with coloring the map, one may as well as alternate with the red-and-blue hues…just for the hell of it.

North Dakota—blue. South Dakota—red. Nebraska—blue. Kansas—red. Oklahoma—blue. Texas—red.

I like this one.  This one is pretty.



I like the diagonal line from Montana to Kentucky. Can we call that the Hillbelt?
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2016, 01:21:03 AM »

At this point, when proceeding with coloring the map, one may as well as alternate with the red-and-blue hues…just for the hell of it.

North Dakota—blue. South Dakota—red. Nebraska—blue. Kansas—red. Oklahoma—blue. Texas—red.

I like this one.  This one is pretty.



I like the diagonal line from Montana to Kentucky. Can we call that the Hillbelt?


Let's try this:


Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2016, 07:50:32 AM »

At this point, when proceeding with coloring the map, one may as well as alternate with the red-and-blue hues…just for the hell of it.

North Dakota—blue. South Dakota—red. Nebraska—blue. Kansas—red. Oklahoma—blue. Texas—red.

I like this one.  This one is pretty.



I like the diagonal line from Montana to Kentucky. Can we call that the Hillbelt?


Let's try this:



But who are the candidates?
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2016, 09:26:31 AM »
« Edited: June 21, 2016, 09:29:41 AM by Beef »

At this point, when proceeding with coloring the map, one may as well as alternate with the red-and-blue hues…just for the hell of it.

North Dakota—blue. South Dakota—red. Nebraska—blue. Kansas—red. Oklahoma—blue. Texas—red.

I like this one.  This one is pretty.



I like the diagonal line from Montana to Kentucky. Can we call that the Hillbelt?


Let's try this:



But who are the candidates?

Blue = Russ Feingold
Red = Martin O'Malley
Orange = Lindsay Graham Jeff Sessions
Green = Michael Moore
Yellow = Joel Olsteen
Logged
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,287
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -5.39

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2016, 12:11:51 PM »

South Dakota does have a large Native American population that usually votes Democrat.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,953


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2016, 12:16:01 PM »

Given that Clinton winning Utah depends on Mormons largely abandoning the GOP, it's inconceivable that she then loses Arizona.
Logged
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,287
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -5.39

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 21, 2016, 12:44:00 PM »
« Edited: June 21, 2016, 01:05:11 PM by Chrome »

Given that Clinton winning Utah depends on Mormons largely abandoning the GOP, it's inconceivable that she then loses Arizona.

Arizona is only 6.4% Mormon. Arizona probably would flip, but I think that it would not be inconceivable if it did not.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 13 queries.