Rasmussen: Clinton +5
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 06:45:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Rasmussen: Clinton +5		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rasmussen: Clinton +5  (Read 882 times)
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 23, 2016, 10:40:11 AM »
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch

Clinton: 44
Trump: 39
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2016, 04:14:26 PM »
wow not even Rasmussen can manipulate a tie/trump lead anymore--sad!
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2016, 04:57:06 PM »
Quote from: King on June 23, 2016, 04:14:26 PM
wow not even Rasmussen can manipulate a tie/trump lead anymore--sad!
I don't think the polling outfit formerly owned by Rasmussen is trying anything of the sort. These numbers are in line with most reputable pollsters at the moment.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2016, 05:14:42 PM »
When this is the sunniest view of the prospect of a Trump victory not from the Trump campaign itself, then the campaign is in a very bad spot.
Logged
Chaddyr23
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 479
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.19, S: -5.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2016, 12:24:49 AM »
I am concerned that Clinton hasn't broke out this 43 to 45% range a whole month now
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,830
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2016, 01:03:47 AM »
Quote from: Chaddyr23 on June 24, 2016, 12:24:49 AM
I am concerned that Clinton hasn't broke out this 43 to 45% range a whole month now

Obama in 2012 was polling at 46% in June, and he was an incumbent.
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,039
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2016, 01:28:00 AM »
Quote from: Landslide Lyndon on June 24, 2016, 01:03:47 AM
Quote from: Chaddyr23 on June 24, 2016, 12:24:49 AM
I am concerned that Clinton hasn't broke out this 43 to 45% range a whole month now

Obama in 2012 was polling at 46% in June, and he was an incumbent.


Haven't you heard? Hillary is held to a higher standard. If she's not polling at 90 percent in every state, Democrats should be concerned and should reconsider her nomination.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2016, 05:46:10 PM »
Quote from: Bitch is the New Birkenstock on June 24, 2016, 01:28:00 AM
Quote from: Landslide Lyndon on June 24, 2016, 01:03:47 AM
Quote from: Chaddyr23 on June 24, 2016, 12:24:49 AM
I am concerned that Clinton hasn't broke out this 43 to 45% range a whole month now

Obama in 2012 was polling at 46% in June, and he was an incumbent.


Haven't you heard? Hillary is held to a higher standard. If she's not polling at 90 percent in every state, Democrats should be concerned and should reconsider her nomination.

Is that you Beet? Tongue
Logged
Chaddyr23
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 479
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.19, S: -5.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2016, 03:11:03 PM »
Quote from: Bitch is the New Birkenstock on June 24, 2016, 01:28:00 AM
Quote from: Landslide Lyndon on June 24, 2016, 01:03:47 AM
Quote from: Chaddyr23 on June 24, 2016, 12:24:49 AM
I am concerned that Clinton hasn't broke out this 43 to 45% range a whole month now

Obama in 2012 was polling at 46% in June, and he was an incumbent.


Haven't you heard? Hillary is held to a higher standard. If she's not polling at 90 percent in every state, Democrats should be concerned and should reconsider her nomination.

Think you might need to relax, I am just pointing out my concern, I'm a fairly standard Dem and started phonebanking for Clinton already. I think it is fair to notice she hasn't had a bump as of yet
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.