Is this the Trumpster's dumbest phrase ever?

[Sir Mohamed]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I mean, what is this? Is this the Trumpster's dumbest phrase? His logic is just second to none. He talks like a three-year old.

The whole story

[Adam Griffin]

He has used a similar form of speech before on several occasions when discussing other issues. I actually think it's intentional. There is some pretty good analysis about how Trump very carefully picks his words and structures his speech in such a way as to establish authority while selling listeners on a concept. He always ends each sentence with a "strong" word, repeats it several times, and peppers any broader amount of commentary with several instances of this.

This actually doesn't look odd at all when you consider that. He's actually being clever. He's essentially saying, "she's a racist, and the reason we know she's a racist because I said she was a racist (and since I've established authority with you prior, you will accept my circular logic as fact)". He's just a bit more blatant about it here than he usually is with this stuff. It probably worked with all the people his broader shtick affects regardless. Partisanship is the only thing keeping him from being more effective at what he does.

[Meclazine for Israel]

Is this claim true?

"Warren dishonestly listed herself as Native American while working as a faculty member at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard to help her career."

If it is, then that is a pretty low act. Whether or not it is racist or not, I will leave up to the purists.

[Santander]

Is this claim true?

"Warren dishonestly listed herself as Native American while working as a faculty member at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard to help her career."

If it is, then that is a pretty low act. Whether or not it is racist or not, I will leave up to the purists.

Yes, it was brought up often during 2012.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

Is this claim true?

"Warren dishonestly listed herself as Native American while working as a faculty member at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard to help her career."

If it is, then that is a pretty low act. Whether or not it is racist or not, I will leave up to the purists.

Yes, it was brought up often during 2012.

and it's as nonsense now as it was then
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/06/28/why-donald-trump-calls-elizabeth-warren-pocahontas/

[Deblano]

He has used a similar form of speech before on several occasions when discussing other issues. I actually think it's intentional. There is some pretty good analysis about how Trump very carefully picks his words and structures his speech in such a way as to establish authority while selling listeners on a concept. He always ends each sentence with a "strong" word, repeats it several times, and peppers any broader amount of commentary with several instances of this.

This actually doesn't look odd at all when you consider that. He's actually being clever. He's essentially saying, "she's a racist, and the reason we know she's a racist because I said she was a racist (and since I've established authority with you prior, you will accept my circular logic as fact)". He's just a bit more blatant about it here than he usually is with this stuff. It probably worked with all the people his broader shtick affects regardless. Partisanship is the only thing keeping him from being more effective at what he does.

[Likely Voter]

This is obviously Trump's way of talking about reverse racism and political correctness. Among his base, reverse racism is seen as a big deal.

Newsweek today talked about a new poll...

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.newsweek.com/new-data-why-white-working-class-voters-back-trump-475447