Labour Party (UK) Leadership Election, 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 01:28:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Labour Party (UK) Leadership Election, 2016 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Labour Party (UK) Leadership Election, 2016  (Read 56776 times)
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 395
United Kingdom
WWW
« on: July 19, 2016, 10:08:59 AM »

As someone who lived through the 1980's where a Labour civil war locked the Conservatives undeservedly into power I'm feeling jaded by the current trouble and strife within the party.

The left wing socialist wing of the party and the social democratic right wing at war is as old as the hills if you read about the party's history.

It dates back to at least the 1950's when the left had the figurehead of Aneurin Bevan to Tony Benn in the 1970's and 1980's. Now there is Jeremy Corbyn in the 2010's.

Essentially Labour is two parties that pretty much hates each other's guts and really shouldn't be part of the same political movement.

FPTP is the overriding reason they operate under the same umbrella so the ongoing conflict between left and right is not to go away anytime soon so long as that voting system is retained.

This article by Andrew Rawnsley is a good piece on this ongoing historical internal conflict:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jul/19/imf-cuts-uk-growth-forecasts-following-brexit-vote
Logged
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 395
United Kingdom
WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2016, 04:53:15 AM »

If I'm reading what's going on correctly the Corbynistas are presently busily turning the Labour Party into a pure left wing protest party.

That's all fine and dandy but the end result will almost certainly be an open ended period of Conservative government.

I really don't see the point of doing that in all honesty.
Logged
ChrisDR68
PoshPaws68
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 395
United Kingdom
WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2016, 04:45:18 AM »

Labour (and the Tories for that matter) should probably have left electing their party leaders with their MP's in the House of Commons.

Trying to make themselves more democratic has lead to all sorts of problems in both parties (Iain Duncan Smith anyone?).

MP's are answerable to their electorates. Party members are answerable to no-one.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.