IL & WI Senate races: Koch brothers cancel their backing for Johnson (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:03:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  IL & WI Senate races: Koch brothers cancel their backing for Johnson (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IL & WI Senate races: Koch brothers cancel their backing for Johnson  (Read 2271 times)
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


« on: June 28, 2016, 02:19:28 PM »

Oh s**t, they're wasting money in New Hampshire. The state is not winnable, while men favor Republicans by small margins, women favor Democrats by margins much higher. And more women are still undecided, so Climbing Maggie still has room to grow. Angry New Hampshire women exist, even if they don't act that way in person, they sure do at the ballots. My guess is Florida and Arizona are absent because the primaries are yet to happen, and could change the dynamics. North Carolina and Iowa are not bad places to spend, either.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2016, 02:29:17 PM »

If every poll shows Clinton and Hassan winning NH women by landslides, and it's true that these 'angry NH women' (or whatever pathetic little fantasy you're using now to give an excuse for Scott Brown losing) are real, wouldn't they be winning by landslides in the toplines as well?

Uh, because there's a group called men? IIRC, PPP's latest NH poll showed Clinton trailing by 15 points among men.

But if 'angry NH women' and men take up the same percentage of the electorate, with Clinton and Hassan winning women in a landslide but losing men in a landslide, wouldn't it average out to nearly a tie?
While women favor Hassan and men favor Ayotte, women favor Hassan by a larger margin, and more women remain undecided. That equates to a 5 point or so Hassan win.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2016, 11:42:12 PM »

She's toast.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2016, 04:14:09 PM »

Good, that race is unwinnable. Are they wasting money in New Hampshire? If so they need to get out.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2016, 04:40:00 PM »


WI is definitely more winnable than NH. Why are they going to waste money in NH when Climbing Maggie is ridiculously safe?
Republicans have a better chance at holding WI than NH, but that's really not saying much. Johnson seems to be saying a lot of stupid things lately, and I think he's hurting himself. If only they could sub in Reid Ribble, Rebecca Kleefisch, JB Van Hollen, or someone competent. If Kirk or Ayotte were running in Wisconsin, I'd say they would even be slightly favored.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2016, 05:19:05 PM »

They need to put money into Indiana. Bayh is beatable and the senate becomes almost surely lost without the Indiana seat.
Agree. Give Indiana a Young relacement for Coats, and make sure Evan doesn't Bayh his old seat back.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.