James Comey Clinton Email Congressional Testimony Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 09:32:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  James Comey Clinton Email Congressional Testimony Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: James Comey Clinton Email Congressional Testimony Thread  (Read 1364 times)
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,735
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

« on: July 07, 2016, 11:38:36 AM »

So none of them were actually marked classified?

Three of the 30,000 had "classified" somewhere in them, but according to Comey, it was buried in the text, and had loads of replies before they reached Clinton's desk, and it would be unreasonable to apportion blame onto her, since she was only being asked to reply to the last email in the chain, rather than the person who sent it along. At least that's my understanding.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,735
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2016, 01:02:23 PM »

So, on Tuesday it was "110 emails in 52 email chains were in some category of classification". Now it's "Well, three emails were marked classified, but you wouldn't see that if you weren't looking for it." How are the two statements even consistent? Serious answers only please.

110 e-mails contained classified material (likely classified after-the-fact). 3 were marked classified somewhere at the time she received them.

I think.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.