Does Meredith McIver really exist?

[Lyin' Steve]

So people on Twitter are making the following claims under "#MeredithMcIver" which I haven't bothered to verify:
Her Facebook page is a day old and has no friends
Her Twitter picture is of a Pilates instructor from Florida
She wasn't on Trump's payroll as reported in June
Could all be Twitter bs of course.  There has been a fair amount of fake stuff going around, some blonde lady has been amassing the retweets with her fake plagiarised Trump tweets, and Piers Morgan says he's met Meredith many times.
Still, wouldn't put it past this campaign.

[ProudModerate2]

Let's wait and see what the media/people find.
I cant imagine that the Trump /IS Dense campaign would do something so insane, as to create a fake name/identity, after all the embarrassment they just went through .... or maybe not.

[Seriously?]

I think all you need is Piers Morgan here. He's not going to lie.

Also keep in mind that if she's a writer, as alleged, it could be a pen name or she's using her maiden name to write and has since got married and gets paid in her legal name.

[ProudModerate2]

http://time.com/4415378/meredith-mciver-donald-trump-speech/

You must be logged in to read this quote.

If she's a fictitious person, that's some weird deep background.

[The Other Castro]

Give me the blue pill please, I don't want to find out how far down this rabbit hole goes...

[PeteB]

Yes she does (she's the one on the left).

[Lincoln Republican]

Apparently.

[Seriously?]

Per the NY Post, she's exists and is a registered Democrat.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/20/melania-trumps-speechwriter-is-a-registered-democrat/

[Alcon]

Per the NY Post, she's exists and is a registered Democrat.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/20/melania-trumps-speechwriter-is-a-registered-democrat/

Oh, look at that, the speechwriter has admitted that the nearly identical word use and phrasing wasn't a one-in-a-trillion coincidence.  Gasp.

When can I expect your reply in the other thread admitting you were full of crap about rejecting the statistical improbability of this being a coincidence, or giving a competent defense for believing it was?

[ProudModerate2]

Per the NY Post, she's exists and is a registered Democrat.
http://nypost.com/2016/07/20/melania-trumps-speechwriter-is-a-registered-democrat/

Oh, look at that, the speechwriter has admitted that the nearly identical word use and phrasing wasn't a one-in-a-trillion coincidence.  Gasp.
When can I expect your reply in the other thread admitting you were full of crap about rejecting the statistical improbability of this being a coincidence, or giving a competent defense for believing it was?

He wont admit to it. Seems that Seriously is quite the narcissist himself ...... hmmmm, wonder what the statistical probability is of Seriously possibly being trump.

[Seriously?]

Per the NY Post, she's exists and is a registered Democrat.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/20/melania-trumps-speechwriter-is-a-registered-democrat/

Oh, look at that, the speechwriter has admitted that the nearly identical word use and phrasing wasn't a one-in-a-trillion coincidence.  Gasp.

When can I expect your reply in the other thread admitting you were full of crap about rejecting the statistical improbability of this being a coincidence, or giving a competent defense for believing it was?

You're not going to. Give it a rest already.

[Alcon]

Per the NY Post, she's exists and is a registered Democrat.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/20/melania-trumps-speechwriter-is-a-registered-democrat/

Oh, look at that, the speechwriter has admitted that the nearly identical word use and phrasing wasn't a one-in-a-trillion coincidence.  Gasp.

When can I expect your reply in the other thread admitting you were full of crap about rejecting the statistical improbability of this being a coincidence, or giving a competent defense for believing it was?

You're not going to. Give it a rest already.

Nope.  You wasted my time, strawmanned my arguments, and I'm not going to let this go.  Why not kill two birds in one stone, and silence me as well as prove you're not a credulous, disingenuous hack?  

Otherwise, I'm happy to continuously remind people how intellectually dishonest you are every time you enter a debate of substance.  Why should others waste their time when you just weasel out of arguments like that?