Would it be risky for Democrats to oppose the first ever black chief justice? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 10:18:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Would it be risky for Democrats to oppose the first ever black chief justice? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would it be risky for Democrats to oppose the first ever black chief justice?
#1
Yes (R)		  
#2
No (R)		  
#3
Yes (D)		  
#4
No (D)		  
#5
Yes (L)		  
#6
No (L)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: Would it be risky for Democrats to oppose the first ever black chief justice?  (Read 1947 times)
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70
« on: June 20, 2005, 09:51:30 PM »
I'd rather have Thomas then Scalia. Believe it or not, they're not identical; Thomas is slightly more strict in defining the Constitution, Scalia is slightly more conservative politically.

Personally, I think Bush should appoint John Bolton as Chief Justice Cheesy (just kidding).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 13 queries.