Would it be risky for Democrats to oppose the first ever black chief justice? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:31:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Would it be risky for Democrats to oppose the first ever black chief justice? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would it be risky for Democrats to oppose the first ever black chief justice?
#1
Yes (R)
 
#2
No (R)
 
#3
Yes (D)
 
#4
No (D)
 
#5
Yes (L)
 
#6
No (L)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: Would it be risky for Democrats to oppose the first ever black chief justice?  (Read 1961 times)
Blue Rectangle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,683


Political Matrix
E: 8.50, S: -0.62

« on: June 20, 2005, 02:12:43 PM »

The scandal manufactured by the Democrats when Thomas was nominated didn't keep him from the Court (even though the Dems controlled the Senate).  That was a long time ago, so what can the Dems use against him this time?

Opposition would have to come in the form of filibuster or procedural delays in committee, since Republicans aren't going to defect on Thomas (maybe a certain RI RINO, but no others).  Since a partisan filibuster of elevation to Chief Justice is unprecedented, I think it would be a huge mistake.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.