WikiLeaks DNC emails megathread

[Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!]

There could be evidence in the emails that Hillary Clinton murdered and devoured an infant as a sacrifice to Satan and the red avatars here would still be saying "it is nothing! Nothing interesting in these emails! Is boring, move along!"

After the denialism from Trump backers on that speech, its funny to see the same in reverse

[Fusionmunster]

There could be evidence in the emails that Hillary Clinton murdered and devoured an infant as a sacrifice to Satan and the red avatars here would still be saying "it is nothing! Nothing interesting in these emails! Is boring, move along!"

After the denialism from Trump backers on that speech, its funny to see the same in reverse

Except theres not. The DNC and the Sanders Campaign did not get along, it was obvious he wasnt winning by March. While bad optics, its logical to think they thought his sole purpose was to cause damage.

[JerryArkansas]

God damn, will you ever stop.  Beating a dead horse here.  Don't you have a life outside of searching these emails for "bad" things?

I had the day off.

And nice ad hominem attack there.

When you are offering up edgy stuff, and hyping this up, why waste time trying to disprove your arguments. 

Really, the only people who are hyping this up are the Republican hacks; which have been swarming over this thread, the bitter Bernie Stans; which you are a part of Alpha, and the media who want a damn horse race. 

Also, why aren't you posting the social security numbers that posted as well, since you seem to want to post every random thing that you can find.

[Wells]

DNC member killing horses for insurance money.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/578

DNC making fun of black womans name.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17942

DNC calling mexicans taco bowls.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17942

DNC members telling each other, "I love you too. no homo."
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/425

DNC requesting a pull on MSNBC commentary segment.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6107

DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12450

DNC conspiring to create false Trump information and release with reuters.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102

DNC Hillary supporters infiltrated Sanders campaign.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4776

DNC members going to complain to Morning Joe producers about his mentioning of a rigged syste:
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8806

DNC discussing their relationship with NBC/MSNBC/CNN and how to get better treatment:
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13762

Super PAC paying young voters to push back online Sanders supporters.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8351

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz having an off the record meeting in Phil Griffin's office, who is the president of MSNBC.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8867

DNC being messed with by the Washington Examiner.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5304

DNC discussing Hillary's policies as unfeasible.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/519

1) They were vetting a donor to go to a White House dinner. He failed.
2) How do you know that the person's a black woman? Are you judging them because their name sounds like a black woman's name? RACIST AND SEXIST!!1!!
3) The link just sends me to LaQueenia.
4) No one has ever said that before. How incriminating.
5) She requested that they wrap up more quickly. MEDIA CENSORSHIP!!1!1!
6) The Clinton campaign has organization. They got a reporter to release a story earlier. Big deal.
7) That was the single most misleading summary I have ever read. The emails were about an interview between a DNC worker (who had been writing opposition files) and Reuters. However, your spin was so creative, you should become a writer (and leave this forum).
8 ) A DNC worker had friends. Those friends worked in the Sanders campaign. Friends=/=Moles.
9) I hate it when people lie on national television, too.
10) They were talking about how they could reach out NBC/MSNBC and improve relations with them.
11) This is incriminating and just disappointing. Despite negotiations, Sanders still attacked Clinton and forced the DNC into damage control.
12) Like Trump's meetings with Fox News owners?
13) Okay. This wasn't even remotely incriminating, though.
14) Yet you claim they were in Clinton's back pocket? And they rigged the primaries and media for her? OK.

But I'm sure that the only reason a 74 year old socialist lost to the biggest name in Democratic politics is because it was rigged and the fix was in.

[egalitt]

DNC making fun of black womans name.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17942

DNC calling mexicans taco bowls.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17942

DNC members telling each other, "I love you too. no homo."
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/425

DNC requesting a pull on MSNBC commentary segment.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6107

DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12450

DNC conspiring to create false Trump information and release with reuters.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102

DNC Hillary supporters infiltrated Sanders campaign.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4776

DNC members going to complain to Morning Joe producers about his mentioning of a rigged syste:
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8806

DNC discussing their relationship with NBC/MSNBC/CNN and how to get better treatment:
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13762

Super PAC paying young voters to push back online Sanders supporters.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8351

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz having an off the record meeting in Phil Griffin's office, who is the president of MSNBC.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8867

DNC being messed with by the Washington Examiner.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5304

DNC discussing Hillary's policies as unfeasible.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/519

Good job, thanks. I hope Sanders will be resolute enough to disavow his endorsement.

[Hnv1]

Party politics is nasty. News at 11.

[ag]

At this point anybody who is involved in any political campaign who uses e-mail or cell phones should assume he is listened to by the entire world. I would provide e-mail training to every campaign employee before s/he is hired.

[Lief 🗽]

Wait is Alpha illiterate or something? None of those summaries describe what is actually happening in the emails lol

[Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!]

No one find it at all concerning that they're making fake Trump job postings to make him look like a misogynist or faking protests with interns?

These things aren't "anything actually happening"?

[egalitt]

No one find it at all concerning that they're making fake Trump job postings to make him look like a misogynist or faking protests with interns?

These things aren't "anything actually happening"?

Nothing extraordinary, routine democratic procedures.

[egalitt]

Special interests have access to the president
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/inside-the-democratic-partys-scramble-for-big-money/2016/07/24/0f02b56c-51c0-11e6-b7de-dfe509430c39_story.html

[Ebsy]

Oh look a Putinbot.

[swf541]

Oh look a Putinbot.

Yep, I thought he was gone.

[MK]

I don't agree with Obamas Marxist ideology, but I do give him respect for being a decent person and not corrupt.  Hillary is already ushering in a corrupt democratic administration.  This wikileak thing stinks worse than Vince Fosters dead body.   

[Seriously?]

And we now have a spreadsheet that suggests that there was a little pay-for-play going on between the DNC and their donors, peddling influence for appointments to federal boards and commissions.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/24/leaked-dnc-documents-show-plans-to-reward-big-donors-with-federal-appointments/#ixzz4FOC85BU7

The source e-mail: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20352
Spreadsheet is attached to the Daily Caller story and redacted.

[Devout Centrist]

I don't agree with Obamas Marxist ideology, but I do give him respect for being a decent person and not corrupt.  Hillary is already ushering in a corrupt democratic administration.  This wikileak thing stinks worse than Vince Fosters dead body.   

Word salad must be tasty

[This account no longer in use.]

I assumed this subforum would get better after the Sanders endorsement. I suppose I was wrong. Both candidates' supporters on this forum have gone back to being below average.

[Dr. Arch]

I assumed this subforum would get better after the Sanders endorsement. I suppose I was wrong. Both candidates' supporters on this forum have gone back to being below average.

Old flames reignited with all the new controversies.

[Devout Centrist]

I assumed this subforum would get better after the Sanders endorsement. I suppose I was wrong. Both candidates' supporters on this forum have gone back to being below average.

The underlying issues can't be fixed by a simple endorsement.

[Ebsy]

And we now have a spreadsheet that suggests that there was a little pay-for-play going on between the DNC and their donors, peddling influence for appointments to federal boards and commissions.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/24/leaked-dnc-documents-show-plans-to-reward-big-donors-with-federal-appointments/#ixzz4FOC85BU7

The source e-mail: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20352
Spreadsheet is attached to the Daily Caller story and redacted.

Donors are very regularly given positions on federal commissions. It will remain that way until Citizens United is overturned, something that if I remember correctly only one of the parties is aiming to do.

[Beet]

Well it's not just Citizens' United being overturned; deeper reforms need to happen; and they must happen through laws. The left has been calling for this stuff for a long time, but the right-wing SCOTUS has repeatedly struck down even modest campaign finance reform.

[egalitt]

Oh look a Putinbot.

Yep, I thought he was gone.

You are badly mistaken. I am always here. My  mission is to help American citizens make appropriate choice in November. And I'm Russianbot. А фамилия моя слишком известна, чтобы я ее называл. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKquy3_PMCo

[This account no longer in use.]

Oh look a Putinbot.

Yep, I thought he was gone.

You are badly mistaken. I am always here. My  mission is to help American citizens make appropriate choice in November. And I'm Russianbot. А фамилия моя слишком известна, чтобы я ее называл. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKquy3_PMCo

В самом деле, мой товарищ! Настало время для нас, чтобы начать захват этих грязных американских капиталистов, избрав Дональда Трампа! Ничто не может пойти не так!

[egalitt]

Oh look a Putinbot.

Yep, I thought he was gone.

You are badly mistaken. I am always here. My  mission is to help American citizens make appropriate choice in November. And I'm Russianbot. А фамилия моя слишком известна, чтобы я ее называл. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKquy3_PMCo

В самом деле, мой товарищ! Настало время для нас, чтобы начать захват этих грязных американских капиталистов, избрав Дональда Трампа! Ничто не может пойти не так!

 
I'm impressed by intellectual abilities of the forum members many of whom can write Russian making so few errors.
I've never suspected Russian to be so popular here. 

[Seriously?]

And we now have a spreadsheet that suggests that there was a little pay-for-play going on between the DNC and their donors, peddling influence for appointments to federal boards and commissions.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/24/leaked-dnc-documents-show-plans-to-reward-big-donors-with-federal-appointments/#ixzz4FOC85BU7

The source e-mail: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20352
Spreadsheet is attached to the Daily Caller story and redacted.

Donors are very regularly given positions on federal commissions. It will remain that way until Citizens United is overturned, something that if I remember correctly only one of the parties is aiming to do.

The party engaging in pay-for-play, right?