Ipsos/Reuters Polls (through DNC week): Clinton +6 (tied 4-way) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:53:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Ipsos/Reuters Polls (through DNC week): Clinton +6 (tied 4-way) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ipsos/Reuters Polls (through DNC week): Clinton +6 (tied 4-way)  (Read 3025 times)
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


« on: July 29, 2016, 02:31:06 PM »
« edited: July 29, 2016, 02:33:15 PM by LittleBigPlanet »

Trump gains two points when Johnson and Stein are added lol.
Yeah, that doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Allow people to vote for Johnson and Stein, and somehow MORE people vote for Trump? How does that work, exactly?
This thing remains a mess. The old poll had 4-way with a Clinton lead and 2-way with a Trump lead. The new poll has the opposite.

It's almost like they are polling two separate samples.

Hopefully they get their methodology right.
They do actually use different samples.

Head-to-Head:
(Asked of registered voters, n=1,290)

Including Johnson & Stein:
(Asked of registered voters, n=1,788)

But why? It's weird :/

And they seem to change theirs methodology for Head-to-Head only. What the hell are they doing?!
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2016, 04:26:32 PM »

According to Nate Silver

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/759104860147122183

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
What the hell? Angry
Logged
Erich Maria Remarque
LittleBigPlanet
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,646
Sweden


« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2016, 06:49:44 PM »

OK, now Reuters says Clinton is actually up by 6 (2-way, LV)

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-idUSKCN1092M5

They really need to get their s--t together.
Well that solves the divergence between 2-way and 4-way.. per the link... Two separate polls.

Why would they have two DIFFERENT samples?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
They probably think, that othervice it might affect the outcome?

If one first chooses X in head-to-head question, one might choose X in 4-way with higher probability than, if there was 4-way question only. Something like this :/
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.