Opinion of Schadenfreude

[they don't love you like i love you]

Is he the single most thick-headed poster currently?

Also obviously has some serious issues with reading comprehension. Like MK-level.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

A very disturbed and hateful person.

[they don't love you like i love you]

Also the Link sock allegations do make a lot of sense when you compare his posts to how some people summarized Link:

Link might have been the worst poster even without the issues that led directly to his banning. Threads were regularly destroyed by his intervention on account of his combination of extreme aggression with bizarre non-sequiturs that seemed to display an exceptional lack of critical thinking or reading comprehension ability.

My favorite was when Tender Branson asked something like "why do Black people in the US have different accents" and then Link aggressively accused him of claiming that "all Black people sound the same". But obviously "the A's are different from the B's in some respect" is not the same as "the A's are all the same in that respect". Galaxies are bigger than molecules; does this mean all galaxies are the same size? He also seemed to have no understanding of is/ought distinctions, and many posters had the bizarre experience of claiming that something shouldn't happen only to be attacked by Link on the supposed grounds that one would have to be naive to think it didn't happen.

Had this really annoying habit

DC Al Fine: Position that doesn't agree with Republican position
Link: Disproves Republican position
Link: Hahaha your argument has been disproved!
DC Al Fine:

[Mr. Reactionary]

One of only three posters I have on ignore.

[they don't love you like i love you]

In addition to his many logical fallacies, he's also big on this, which is like a combination of several fallacies:

Group X of people believe something that's bigoted and stupid. Person Y expresses a view that is not bigoted and stupid, but that Group X would likely agree with. He assumes that Person Y therefore must be part of Group X, attacks the bigoted and stupid positions, and then believes he has debunked Person Y.

It'd be like if a Sanders supporter attacked Hillary during the campaign, so you responded by explaining to them how stupid Trump's wall idea is.

[SATW]

Along with "Seriously?", he is the worst poster here. Like absolutely horrible on every level. Massive HP.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Yeah, he's awful.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

What was Link banned for, again?

[Antonio the Sixth]

What was Link banned for, again?

Constantly being a douchebag?

[RINO Tom]

Along with "Seriously?", he is the worst poster here. Like absolutely horrible on every level. Massive HP.

[Joe Republic]

Wait, I thought it was already generally assumed he's Link, no?

[Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas]

My God, the straw men...

[This account no longer in use.]

I can't even tell what side he's on oftentimes.

[they don't love you like i love you]

Yeah it's amazing how he strawmans to hell but it's still not clear what his point is often.

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

I find it odd that I'm often on the same side theoretically as him, but he is so cartoonishly aggressive and nasty that it feels bad just to be in agreement.

[Vosem]

Awful.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=230327.0

[Green Line]

Rude. So so very rude.

[they don't love you like i love you]

I find it odd that I'm often on the same side theoretically as him, but he is so cartoonishly aggressive and nasty that it feels bad just to be in agreement.

Plus you can be on the same side as him and STILL get attacked if you disagree with one aspect of his arguments or strawmen or even simply ask a question that someone on on the other side might be prone to ask  in which case he'll assume you disagree with him on everything and aggressively attack you as such.

[World politics is up Schmitt creek]

Simply not a pleasant person.