Question about taxation
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 12:08:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: World politics is up Schmitt creek)
  Question about taxation
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Question about taxation  (Read 467 times)
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,251
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 30, 2016, 09:03:18 PM »

Why are government benefits considered taxable income, and why is the recipient required to pay the tax rather than have the tax subtracted from the benefits upfront?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2016, 11:05:27 PM »

Why are government benefits considered taxable income, and why is the recipient required to pay the tax rather than have the tax subtracted from the benefits upfront?

Which benefits?

In the case of Social Security, if you believe that because of other income your benefits will be taxable, you can arrange to have income tax withheld from them. Similarly, you can opt to have income tax withheld from your unemployment benefits when you receive them.

In the case of unemployment, it is intended as a substitute for wages, and the tax that pays for them is not (except in a few states) paid in any part by the employee, but the employer. As a general rule, any sort of government benefit that is intended as a substitute for income the person would have received if the economy and/or weather had gone as they hoped is treated as income for purposes of taxation. (SSI is not considered an income substitute since a person qualifying for SSI both cannot have been capable of earning income and can't have assets of their own that would earn income.)

In the case of Social Security, making it potentially taxable was enacted in 1984, and increased in 1993, as a substitute for making Social Security benefits means-tested.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,251
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2016, 11:41:07 PM »

Disability benefits, specifically.  I'm asking because of a family member.  She's under 65 and is fully disabled and cannot do any work, so all her income will come exclusively from Social Security.

But if those benefits are taken as a substitute for wages, why doesn't the government simply withhold the income owed automatically?  Sorry if it's a dumb question.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2016, 11:54:35 AM »

Because SSA and IRS don't automatically share everything. The SSA doesn't know about other income unless you tell them. However, if all of her income will be coming from SSD, she won't be subject to income tax on it. It's only if she has other income that she might owe income tax because of Social Security.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.