Also, here are my own thoughts on this:
George Allen/Mitt Romney (R): 52.08% PV; 326 EVs
Barack Obama/Evan Bayh (D): 46.11% PV; 212 EVs
Basically, the recovering economy in 2011-2012 (in spite of President Allen's previous misguided austerity policies in 2009-2010) along with the rapidly escalating and extremely high tensions between Saddam Hussein's Iraq and Iran cause most Americans to agree with President Allen's argument that the U.S. Presidency isn't a place for-on-the job training--especially given the current situation in the Middle East.
Seems about right. With regards to the rising tensions in the Middle East in this scenario, would you feel that President Allen would be more likely to support either Iraq, Iran, or neither. Personally, I feel that President Allen may decide to support Iraq if Saddam Hussien promises to allow the US to install Reza Pahlavi (the Shah of Iran's son) into power if the Iraqi army is able to successfully remove the Iranian government from power.
