What would GOP primaries have looked like if the Khan feud happened before Feb.?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 01:01:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  What would GOP primaries have looked like if the Khan feud happened before Feb.?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What would GOP primaries have looked like if the Khan feud happened before Feb.?  (Read 528 times)
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 05, 2016, 06:16:10 AM »

What would the 2016 GOP primaries have looked like if the feud between Trump and the Khan family happened before the beginning of the Republican primaries on February 1, 2016?
Logged
Redban
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,969


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2016, 07:32:06 AM »

No difference.

The Republican electorate in the primaries (less than 30% of the actual Republican electorate) is markedly different from the general electorate  that we're observing right now. The Republican electorate -- the people who gave Trump 14 million votes -- wouldn't have cared about this feud with Mr. Khan.
Logged
Rocky Rockefeller
Nelson Rockefeller 152
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 447
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2016, 08:52:50 AM »

Trump's would have won with 60% for putting those 'merica hating mooslims in their place
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2016, 10:44:02 AM »

It would have made a difference, I think, partly because it would have combined with the bad publicity of a loss in Iowa. If it had come out earlier in the day, it could have led to a third place finish to Rubio.
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,039
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2016, 11:28:12 AM »

No difference.

The Republican electorate in the primaries (less than 30% of the actual Republican electorate) is markedly different from the general electorate  that we're observing right now. The Republican electorate -- the people who gave Trump 14 million votes -- wouldn't have cared about this feud with Mr. Khan.

^^ This.

If anything, it would have increased his numbers going after a Muslim family. As Redban indicated, these new numbers are from a new electorate that's drastically different from the electorate of Republican primary voters who backed Trump so solidly. Trump is still stuck in primary mode and seems to think that his "tell it like it is/say what he means" will always be a benefit, regardless of how controversial or vitriolic his comments and rhetoric are. This new electorate doesn't want to hear him attacking a Muslim family, a Mexican American judge, a disabled reporter, etc. These kinds of things are good for ratings, and that seems to be all Trump cares about, but are not good at winning voters.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,063


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2016, 11:35:30 AM »

No difference. The "base" was determined to commit political suicide this election.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2016, 11:49:05 AM »

Like every other inane comment Trump has made, it would have helped him in the GOP primary.
Logged
uti2
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,495


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2016, 03:49:45 PM »

Khan never would've had a platform to attack him in the first place.
Logged
uti2
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,495


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2016, 03:54:06 PM »

No difference. The "base" was determined to commit political suicide this election.

No, the problem is that none of the candidates respected the concerns of the base, so they went with Trump, even Cruz was suspiciously pro-tpp and pro-legal status the second up until Trump entered the race. If the GOP had even offered a compromise candidate respecting some of their concerns in the manner of nixon, they probably would've went with him, but instead, all they had was reagan clones, who had nothing but empty talking points.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 05, 2016, 05:32:49 PM »

I think in the PPP poll on this, 41% of Republicans disapproved from Trump's comments vis-a-vis the Khans while 40% approved. That's not too different from Trump's final primary share, so clearly no difference.

A lot of the things he said, that just bounced off him, during the primaries would've been equally if not more damaging than this had they happened now. Calling Mexicans rapists, attacking the Pope, deriding McCain... the primary electorate was just completely out of whack with the rest of the country. As I've been saying, many if not most of them are living in an alternate universe constructed by the conservative media bubble.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 13 queries.