Would the previous poster head for Iowa or New Hampshire (or neither)?

[Kingpoleon]

Iowa, to build up a base in Des Moines and on college campuses there. Besides that, he's a good fit for hawkish Democrats. After Iowa he'd try Nevada to keep a hold on the West as a Western establishment candidate.

(Do me as R or D, whichever you prefer)

[Kingpoleon]

He'd rely on students, union workers, left-populist farmers, and a couple others to get a very strong showing in Iowa. From there, he'd rely on the youth/college and urban vote in New Hampshire, and then follow that up with heavy investment in New England minus Connecticut, everything west of Missouri/AR/LA minus Texas and California, and Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Kentucky and West Virginia. In other words, most of New England, the Western states besides CA and TX, the caucus states north of Mason-Dixon, Kentucky, and West Virginia.

TL;DR: Focus on Iowa and then head to New Hampshire for a strong showing after Iowa votes.

Do me as a Democrat.

[Kingpoleon]

New Hampshire

[Kingpoleon]

New Hampshire, by a long shot.

[Kingpoleon]

Iowa, where your endorsements prove very popular.

(Is my sarcasm too biting for Iowa?)

[Kingpoleon]

Iowa!