Should 2nd Amendment People do something about Clinton?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 06:47:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Should 2nd Amendment People do something about Clinton?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
They should go after Trump instead
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 78

Author Topic: Should 2nd Amendment People do something about Clinton?  (Read 2337 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: August 10, 2016, 06:35:59 AM »

Of course they should. They should show up at the ballot box en masse against Clinton. That's how democracy works.
Actually, they should show up at the ballot box enough masse for Clinton. The reaction this country would have to a Trump presidency would present a grave threat to the continued existence of the Constitution as we know it, Second Amendment included.
Logged
Slander and/or Libel
Figs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,338


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: August 10, 2016, 07:56:40 AM »

It's a mistake. Mistakes happen. You take your lumps, issue a clarifying statement and move on.

It's pretty darn clear what Hillary said during that speech. Of course her rivals are going to pick on her about it. It's politics.

Trump was inartful today. Nothing more. Nothing less. He was not advocating anything close to what you leftists claim. He issued a clarifying statement. Of course the left and their DNC presttitutes will make a huge story about this. Trump will take his lumps and move on. Again, it's politics.

Is the allegation that she has some secret plan to raise taxes on the middle class, not detailed in her policy proposals, and she just casually announced it at a campaign rally?
Logged
elcorazon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,402


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: August 10, 2016, 09:42:05 AM »

Of course they should. They should show up at the ballot box en masse against Clinton. That's how democracy works.

The other stuff you are insinuating, of course not.
lol
Logged
Deblano
EdgarAllenYOLO
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,680
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: August 10, 2016, 09:52:36 AM »

Of course they should. They should show up at the ballot box en masse against Clinton. That's how democracy works.

The other stuff you are insinuating, of course not.
Logged
Deblano
EdgarAllenYOLO
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,680
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: August 10, 2016, 09:53:41 AM »

I had to double check if Lief made this thread or not.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,733
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: August 10, 2016, 10:55:12 AM »

It's a mistake. Mistakes happen. You take your lumps, issue a clarifying statement and move on.

It's pretty darn clear what Hillary said during that speech. Of course her rivals are going to pick on her about it. It's politics.

Trump was inartful today. Nothing more. Nothing less. He was not advocating anything close to what you leftists claim. He issued a clarifying statement. Of course the left and their DNC presttitutes will make a huge story about this. Trump will take his lumps and move on. Again, it's politics.

I think you need a hearing aid, among other things.

Let's start with a brain and then go for the hearing aid.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,120
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: August 10, 2016, 10:56:57 AM »

Lol at all the votes for "they should go after Trump instead." I guess Hillary really was a trendsetter in 2008! So progressive and ahead of the curve.

https://youtu.be/nC6Sa8t9Ywg
SUNY Cornell graduate Keith Olberman is a loser. Watching that clip made my skin crawl. But it does bring to bear that candidates stay dumb things all the time.

Remember when Hillary! said she wanted to "tax the middle class?" When was that again? A few years ago? No try last week.
Glad to see we're still not serious about balancing that budget.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 15 queries.