Which posters do you have on ignore?

[Hammy]

Nobody, because I'm not afraid of people with different opinions than mine.  Anyone who has somebody on ignore for ideological reasons is an intellectual coward trying to live in a "safe" bubble in my book.

This. It just makes everything too one-sided for people using it. Even if somebody was being obnoxious and actually harassing me I'd simply report them as they'd likely be violating the rules anyway.

[RINO Tom]

Debating Wulfric because of his obnoxiously large signature, but I always like to know who he's endorsing in which races.

Well, I mean, this goes without saying.  Wouldn't want to be caught at a social outing and not be up to date!  It'd be like not being caught up on Game of Thrones.

[Mr. Reactionary]

Lief 🐋
ｴﾊﾞｰｸﾞﾘｰﾝ夢魔
#FreeMelania

[Xing]

Just Seriously?

The 2016 board became significantly more bearable one I decided to put him on ignore. It's still not great, mind you, but it's a lot more tolerable.

[Lyin' Steve]

The only ones who ever tempted me were Schadenfreude and Shadows.
There's no real point as far as I can tell because even if I ignore all of someone's posts, the thread will still be derailed by other people arguing with them, so why bother.
Those two just post vitriolic nonsense that nobody ever responds to though, because most people have them on ignore, so it would've been easier.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
ag
Grumps
MK
Asian Nazi
dirks
Seriously?
Thomas from NJ
Hillary/Tim 2016
BundouYMB

Most people I add don't stay on for long.

[The Arizonan]

I don't have anyone on ignore. Not a single poster.

If you put posters on ignore, then I think you might have bigger issues than the posters themselves.

[LLR]

I don't have anyone on ignore. Not a single poster.

If you put posters on ignore, then I think you might have bigger issues than the posters themselves.

Personally, Id rather have the choice of skipping all of Bronz and Seriously's posts. I don't understand why that means I have issues.

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

Reaganfan

Mods please ban.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Reaganfan

Mods please ban.

Has Naso returned yet or he's still angry at this site's muh leftist bias?

[Ebsy]

○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
Da-Jon
Rep. JCL
Seriously?
ProgressiveCanadian
StatesPoll
Shadows

[Kingpoleon]

Debating Wulfric because of his obnoxiously large signature, but I always like to know who he's endorsing in which races.

Well, I mean, this goes without saying.  Wouldn't want to be caught at a social outing and not be up to date!  It'd be like not being caught up on Game of Thrones.

"Did you hear that RINO Tom didn't know Wulfric officially endorsed Caroline Fayard? Sad!"

- Not a quote from the Atlasian Post-"Social" "Hang Out"

[Bojack Horseman]

None.

[dead0man]

most of 'em

[Devout Centrist]

Devout Centrist.

That guy is a HP.

[Leinad]

None.

[Clark Kent]

ClarkKent

[Frodo]

I'd be curious to find out if anyone placed me on ignore in all the years I've been posting here. 

[Bakersfield Uber Alles]

CountryClassSF
bobloblaw
IronFist
Col. Roosevelt
kansasdemocrat
StatesPoll

I'm pretty sure that at least half of them have been banned. There have been a few current users who were on the list, but have since been removed.

[DINGO Joe]

I'd be curious to find out if anyone placed me on ignore in all the years I've been posting here. 

Only those who hate or are scared of Science!, so probably some of the Drumpfers.

[The Dowager Mod]

Just one.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Ignoring is a pointless feature. I bet most of you can't resist clicking "show" from time to time.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

Ignoring is a pointless feature. I bet most of you can't resist clicking "show" from time to time.

There's no temptation when literally an entire page of a thread is ignored. That is a thing of beauty that I just avoided. It's happened quite frequently.

[White Trash]

I had ag on it for a while.

[Vega]

Just one.

Cryptic.