Trump wants an ideological test for immigrants

[Santander]

Great news.

[Santander]

Presumably if you say you support religious freedom, gender equality, and gays rights you fail.

You presume wrong.

If this is targeting muslims, the correct answer would be yes to religious freedom (which the crazies are against), pro-gender equality (forced burkas and killing women that learn is not cool) and gay rights (they kill homosexuals for being homosexual in Islamic countries).

But don't let your ideology to get in the way of how the opposition actually thinks.

Not to mention Sharia marriage and divorce laws that do not treat women with the dignity that they deserve.

[Santander]

This is more than likely blatantly unconstitutional.

It is blatantly constitutional under the Plenary Power Doctrine.

[Santander]

So on the issue of trump's ideological test on gay rights ...
It is OK for many of his supporters, and ultra-conservatives, to be against the expansion of rights for the LGTB community, but not the immigrants ?
How is this an acceptable position ?

Because hating gay people sounds better when you say "It's what Jesus believes" as opposed to "Allah says murder the homos!"

I don't see a significant number of Christians in America openly inciting killing homosexuals. Those who do should be (and are) prosecuted under the laws of the land.

[Santander]

How about an ideological test for Republican presidential candidates instead?

That's what primaries are for.

[Santander]

As for the British application of religious law by general courts. The problem lies in the fact that Britain ENGLAND has no separation of Church and State. In fact, it has an officially established Church.