FDA approves race-specific drug
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 04:07:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  FDA approves race-specific drug
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FDA approves race-specific drug  (Read 1024 times)
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 24, 2005, 09:52:36 AM »

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2005-06-23-racial-pill_x.htm

Just in case there was anyone around that disagreed with me when I noted genetic differences mean medicine can be effective in some race(s), while not in others.

For a drug to work in one race and then be completely useless outside it is just another example of how different biochemistry can be from one genetic subgroup to another.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,080
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2005, 10:07:09 AM »

OMG YOU WERE RIGHT BLACK PEOPLE ARE A DIFFERENT SPECIES ALL ALONG
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,410
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2005, 10:19:56 AM »

For a drug to work in one race and then be completely useless outside it

The funny thing is, that is completely untrue in this situation Smiley
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2005, 11:35:15 AM »

For a drug to work in one race and then be completely useless outside it

The funny thing is, that is completely untrue in this situation Smiley

Maybe you didn't read the article.

A lot of our drugs even work on monkeys, so just because you get 10% effectiveness or something with whites is irrelevant.

Part of the problem is probably that many posters engage in discussions for which they are not factually prepared (i.e. in the area of biology). Anyone with even a rudimentary education in the field, for instance, would recognize how significant biological differences must be for a drug to work in one subgroup and not another (many drugs work across species lines-- look how often rats are valuable in researching drugs).

So, needless to say, something like this is definitive proof racial differences are more than "skin deep," since skin is unrelated to general biochemistry. Granted, many people presumably accept that hypothesis already-- but far, far from all. Many on this site do not, in the face of unarguable fact.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,904


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2005, 11:38:32 AM »

For a drug to work in one race and then be completely useless outside it

The funny thing is, that is completely untrue in this situation Smiley

Maybe you didn't read the article.

A lot of our drugs even work on monkeys, so just because you get 10% effectiveness or something with whites is irrelevant.

Ok, blacks are monkeys. Got it.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2005, 11:44:34 AM »

For a drug to work in one race and then be completely useless outside it

The funny thing is, that is completely untrue in this situation Smiley

Maybe you didn't read the article.

A lot of our drugs even work on monkeys, so just because you get 10% effectiveness or something with whites is irrelevant.

Ok, blacks are monkeys. Got it.

So essentially what you're saying is: "I'm a stupid troll unable to make actual arguments, nor am I able to avoid threads uninteresting to me."
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2005, 02:48:35 PM »

Well...OK.  I'm not sure anyone contested that point.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2005, 03:16:39 PM »

I'm not entirely sure who said that there were no genetic differences whatsoever between those who are black and those who aren't.  Obviously there are, as blacks would not be black if there were not.

The argument you've made over and over that many do dispute is that blacks are genetically more likely to be violent, and this does exactly zero to vindicate that argument.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 24, 2005, 09:57:11 PM »

It does more or less prove it's POSSIBLE and shouldn't be dismissed out of hand-- these are not minor biochemical differences, quite the contrary.
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,227


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 24, 2005, 10:05:58 PM »

Go away PbH2O.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 12 queries.