Michigan -- likely troubles for Republican Representatives?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:13:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Michigan -- likely troubles for Republican Representatives?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Michigan -- likely troubles for Republican Representatives?  (Read 759 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 19, 2016, 10:50:57 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/trump-clinton-michigan-election-227176?utm_source=huffingtonpost.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=pubexchange


...........................

Michigan Congressional districts are heavily gerrymandered to the benefit of Republicans in the recent decade. In 2011 the state legislature quickly re-apportioned districts so that such medium-to-large cities as Lansing, East Lansing, Grand Rapids,  Kalamazoo, and Battle Creek were separated and their heavily-Democratic votes would be diluted with rural votes. Republicans would get nothing but slightly-R districts west of the US-23/I-75 corridor.

Donald Trump is doing catastrophically badly in western Michigan... I wonder how many Congressional seats he can take down with him?  R+3 districts can go to Democrats in a wave election.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,392
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2016, 11:03:57 AM »

Wouldn't surprise me if MI-01, MI-06, and MI-07 turned blue. I'd laugh to no end if Amash in MI-03 somehow lost.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2016, 11:09:07 AM »

Is MI-10 (open seat, only R+5) in play too?
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2016, 11:12:24 AM »

Fred Upton in the 6th district is one to keep an eye on, though he has cultivated a moderate image.
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2016, 11:32:09 AM »
« Edited: August 19, 2016, 11:40:00 AM by Kevin »

I'd imgaine Dave Trott and Mike Bishop would have problems too (If the Democrats have fielded stronger oppenents.

I think MI-01 will be ok as Trump should do very well in Northern MI/on the UP. Same for many parts of MI-10 as well. Ditto for MI-07.

Will be interesting to see what happens with Fred Upton's seat though.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,515
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2016, 11:32:56 AM »

Is MI-10 (open seat, only R+5) in play too?
I don't think so.

If I would rank the competitive seats in term of likelihood of party switch:
1) MI-01: open seat, democrats have a good candidate and overperform downballot, republicans have a terrible candidate.
2) MI-07: Tim Walberg is the incumbent, he lost in 2008 and the dem candidate seems good.
3) MI-08
4) MI-06: Upton's district, has a moderate image but swing district.

I think democrats will pick up 1 seat in the end. Picking a 2nd seat is a possibility too but not particularly likely.
Logged
Illiniwek
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,920
Vatican City State



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2016, 12:10:03 PM »

Fred Upton is safe you guys. Don't worry about him.

If Justin Amash lost, it would only be temporary. The district would swing back in two years and he would definitely at least run in the primary.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2016, 12:45:13 PM »

Is MI-10 (open seat, only R+5) in play too?
I don't think so.

If I would rank the competitive seats in term of likelihood of party switch:
1) MI-01: open seat, democrats have a good candidate and overperform downballot, republicans have a terrible candidate.
2) MI-07: Tim Walberg is the incumbent, he lost in 2008 and the dem candidate seems good.
3) MI-08
4) MI-06: Upton's district, has a moderate image but swing district.

I think democrats will pick up 1 seat in the end. Picking a 2nd seat is a possibility too but not particularly likely.
Good analysis. I don't like most Freedom Caucus style candidates, but I really like Bergman (a decorated 3 star Marines General) as a person so I hope he wins. If I HAD to sacrifice a Michigan seat it would be the 10th, pretty upset that the extreme carpetbagging Mitchell won his primary. At least he's not as bad as Mooney, since at least he carpetbagged across the same state.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,515
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 19, 2016, 12:47:00 PM »

Is MI-10 (open seat, only R+5) in play too?
I don't think so.

If I would rank the competitive seats in term of likelihood of party switch:
1) MI-01: open seat, democrats have a good candidate and overperform downballot, republicans have a terrible candidate.
2) MI-07: Tim Walberg is the incumbent, he lost in 2008 and the dem candidate seems good.
3) MI-08
4) MI-06: Upton's district, has a moderate image but swing district.

I think democrats will pick up 1 seat in the end. Picking a 2nd seat is a possibility too but not particularly likely.
Good analysis. I don't like most Freedom Caucus style candidates, but I really like Bergman (a decorated 3 star Marines General) as a person so I hope he wins. If I HAD to sacrifice a Michigan seat it would be the 10th, pretty upset that the extreme carpetbagging Mitchell won his primary. At least he's not as bad as Mooney, since at least he carpetbagged across the same state.
Apparently, Bergman is likely to join the Freedom Caucus for the record.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 19, 2016, 02:55:06 PM »

I can't see Democrats picking up more than MI-01 and MI-07.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 19, 2016, 04:57:57 PM »

Lon Johnson in the open Michigan 1st and State Representative Gretchen Driskell are the Democrats most likely to win in Michigan.
Logged
Bojack Horseman
Wolverine22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,374
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 21, 2016, 01:59:30 PM »

Fred Upton in the 6th district is one to keep an eye on, though he has cultivated a moderate image.

Hate to say it, but it would take a massive, historic landslide to get rid of Fred Upton. He's ridiculously entrenched, winning with 61% and 59% in 2006 and 2008 respectively.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 21, 2016, 10:44:43 PM »

Is Moolenar vunerable in MI-04? His district is R+4.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 21, 2016, 10:58:11 PM »

Moolenar doesn't even have a Democrat opponent.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 21, 2016, 11:02:13 PM »

MI-7 and MI-8 I would be worried and MI-11 if it got really bad. Not worried too much about MI-6(not yet) or MI-10.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 11 queries.