Clinton Campaign Announces Fall TV Ad Buy
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 08:04:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Clinton Campaign Announces Fall TV Ad Buy
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton Campaign Announces Fall TV Ad Buy  (Read 721 times)
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,529
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 22, 2016, 08:55:56 AM »
« edited: August 22, 2016, 09:06:06 AM by Gass3268 »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

They are coming back to Pennsylvania after pulling out from the summer ad buy (probably smart, Trump can't win without PA), but they are going to stay dark in Colorado and Virginia. Also currently nothing is scheduled in the Lean R states (Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, or Missouri).

ABC News
Logged
Redban
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,975


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2016, 09:03:41 AM »

New Hampshire, eh?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,529
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2016, 09:06:49 AM »


It will be interesting to look into the specific market buys once we get those numbers.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2016, 09:12:26 AM »


Still a relatively tight Senate race. If she can depress GOP turnout, or tie Ayotte to Trump, better for her.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2016, 10:36:40 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

They are coming back to Pennsylvania after pulling out from the summer ad buy (probably smart, Trump can't win without PA), but they are going to stay dark in Colorado and Virginia. Also currently nothing is scheduled in the Lean R states (Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, or Missouri).

ABC News

According to Clinton campaign emails, Trump is running a new ad in Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania.  That probably represents the big battleground.  Clinton only needs one of those four, so keeping the war on that front is a good strategy for her.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2016, 11:05:41 AM »

Reducing/Eliminating ad campaign in Virginia, I feel comfortable with.
Colorado .... I'm still somewhat worried about it.
Clinton should move the funds she would have spent in N.H. and use it in CO instead.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2016, 12:06:45 PM »

Glad to see her waste money in New Hampshire. An the Senate race is NOT competitive, Hassan wins, Safe D.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2016, 12:14:28 PM »

I would say that NV and NH are a waste, but both have critical Senate and House races, so I guess it makes sense to defend them. Shame about AZ and GA, but I guess they're focused on just winning right now, and not running up the margin.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,837
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2016, 12:17:30 PM »

I would say that NV and NH are a waste, but both have critical Senate and House races, so I guess it makes sense to defend them. Shame about AZ and GA, but I guess they're focused on just winning right now, and not running up the margin.

There is plenty of time left. If after the first debate Trump tanks even more then they can move in and flood the airwaves for a month.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2016, 10:15:37 PM »

I would say that NV and NH are a waste, but both have critical Senate and House races, so I guess it makes sense to defend them. Shame about AZ and GA, but I guess they're focused on just winning right now, and not running up the margin.

There is plenty of time left. If after the first debate Trump tanks even more then they can move in and flood the airwaves for a month.

If Trump tanks further, Clinton should shift her focus to the Congressional battlegrounds rather than the Presidential ones.  The GOP ain't going to be intimidated by the size of her EV victory into playing nice with her.  If they did, they'd be primaried and they know it.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,837
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 22, 2016, 10:19:48 PM »

I would say that NV and NH are a waste, but both have critical Senate and House races, so I guess it makes sense to defend them. Shame about AZ and GA, but I guess they're focused on just winning right now, and not running up the margin.

There is plenty of time left. If after the first debate Trump tanks even more then they can move in and flood the airwaves for a month.

If Trump tanks further, Clinton should shift her focus to the Congressional battlegrounds rather than the Presidential ones.  The GOP ain't going to be intimidated by the size of her EV victory into playing nice with her.  If they did, they'd be primaried and they know it.

Arizona fits the bill as it has has a senate and a couple of house races. Georgia's senate race might become interesting too if the bottom falls out for Trump.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 22, 2016, 10:35:53 PM »

I would say that NV and NH are a waste, but both have critical Senate and House races, so I guess it makes sense to defend them. Shame about AZ and GA, but I guess they're focused on just winning right now, and not running up the margin.
Critical House and Senate races in New Hampshire?
Logged
Desroko
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 346
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 22, 2016, 11:34:34 PM »
« Edited: August 22, 2016, 11:36:14 PM by Desroko »

I would say that NV and NH are a waste, but both have critical Senate and House races, so I guess it makes sense to defend them. Shame about AZ and GA, but I guess they're focused on just winning right now, and not running up the margin.
Critical House and Senate races in New Hampshire?

Xingkerui still thinks it's 2000, apparently.

They're critical in that Dems must win them for a majority. He's not saying they're tossups. And for what it's worth, the two are nearly tied on Pollster.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2016, 12:14:30 AM »

I would say that NV and NH are a waste, but both have critical Senate and House races, so I guess it makes sense to defend them. Shame about AZ and GA, but I guess they're focused on just winning right now, and not running up the margin.
Critical House and Senate races in New Hampshire?

Xingkerui still thinks it's 2000, apparently.

So do you, since you think Trump will win NV and WI. Tongue NH-01 and NH-Sen aren't toss-ups, but it wouldn't hurt for her to lock those down. Not to mention the gubernatorial race.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 13 queries.