Clinton emailed classified information after leaving State Dept.

[Seriously?]

This shouldn't be possible if she is no longer an employee of the U.S. government... But when you have your own server...

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sourcing: http://nypost.com/2016/08/31/clinton-emailed-classified-information-after-leaving-state-dept/

[dspNY]

The New York Post is not a credible source! Stop spamming

[Beet]

It's over. The e-mail stories will never stop. Congrats, Benghazi attackers. Your missile not only killed a U.S. ambassador, but got a guy who will put us on a war with Islam elected. The most effective terror attack since 9/11.

[afleitch]

It's over. The e-mail stories will never stop. Congrats, Benghazi attackers. Your missile not only killed a U.S. ambassador, but got a guy who will put us on a war with Islam elected. The most effective terror attack since 9/11.

I see the four yearly 'sky is falling' Beet is back with us again.

[Fusionmunster]

It's over. The e-mail stories will never stop. Congrats, Benghazi attackers. Your missile not only killed a U.S. ambassador, but got a guy who will put us on a war with Islam elected. The most effective terror attack since 9/11.

What the heck is wrong with you?

[Ebsy]

Seriously?, could you please tell me how you have read so much information on the email scandal and yet you still don't understand what after the fact classification is?

[Ebsy]

At this point, I do think she needs to hold a tell-all press conference before the 1st debate.  It's the only way Hillary can ever put this issue to bed.

The issue will never be put to bed until she wins the election in a landslide. Idiots will continue to fabricate "news" about any little email because it drives clicks among the permanently deranged.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

At this point, I do think she needs to hold a tell-all press conference before the 1st debate.  It's the only way Hillary can ever put this issue to bed.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

At this point, I do think she needs to hold a tell-all press conference before the 1st debate.  It's the only way Hillary can ever put this issue to bed.

The issue will never be put to bed until she wins the election in a landslide. Idiots will continue to fabricate "news" about any little email because it drives clicks among the permanently deranged.

She would never be able to not having pressconferences if she was a man. She would be described as loser in that case.

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

At this point, I do think she needs to hold a tell-all press conference before the 1st debate.  It's the only way Hillary can ever put this issue to bed.

Why would she want to put it to bed? Every minute spent on more email idiocy is another minute the GOP can't spend going after things that might actually change her supporters minds.

[Seriously?]

The New York Post is not a credible source! Stop spamming

I highly doubt News Corp. made this up.

[Seriously?]

Seriously?, could you please tell me how you have read so much information on the email scandal and yet you still don't understand what after the fact classification is?

Is that the relevant part here? If she's no longer with state, she shouldn't be forwarding anything.

[ProudModerate2]

The New York Post is not a credible source! Stop spamming

I highly doubt News Corp. made this up.

LOL.
Is it just me, or was there not a time a couple months ago where Seriously was calling the New York Post garbage media (and trump was also, for that matter) ?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

It's over. The e-mail stories will never stop. Congrats, Benghazi attackers. Your missile not only killed a U.S. ambassador, but got a guy who will put us on a war with Islam elected. The most effective terror attack since 9/11.

OH MY GOD PLEASE STOP SAYING WORDS

[Seriously?]

The New York Post is not a credible source! Stop spamming

I highly doubt News Corp. made this up.

LOL.
Is it just me, or was there not a time a couple months ago where Seriously was calling the New York Post garbage media (and trump was also, for that matter) ?

Find that thread, because I never call the Post garbage.

I call the Times absolute garbage because they claim to be this paragon of virtue and they are hacks in the bag for the Democrats.

At least you know the Post is a Republican-leaning tabloid.

[kyc0705]

The New York Post is not a credible source! Stop spamming

I highly doubt News Corp. made this up.

LOL.
Is it just me, or was there not a time a couple months ago where Seriously was calling the New York Post garbage media (and trump was also, for that matter) ?

Find that thread, because I never call the Post garbage.

I call the Times absolute garbage because they claim to be this paragon of virtue and they are hacks in the bag for the Democrats.

At least you know the Post is a Republican-leaning tabloid.

If "absolute garbage" can still get 117 Pulitzers, then perhaps hacks aren't too bad after all.

[Seriously?]

The New York Post is not a credible source! Stop spamming

I highly doubt News Corp. made this up.

LOL.
Is it just me, or was there not a time a couple months ago where Seriously was calling the New York Post garbage media (and trump was also, for that matter) ?

Find that thread, because I never call the Post garbage.

I call the Times absolute garbage because they claim to be this paragon of virtue and they are hacks in the bag for the Democrats.

At least you know the Post is a Republican-leaning tabloid.

If "absolute garbage" can still get 117 Pulitzers, then perhaps hacks aren't too bad after all.

And sadly reduced to regurgitating DNC talking points and dismantling their polling operation. They are a shadow of what they used to be. The wall between news and editorial that was a hallmark of the Times is as porous as our wall with Mexico.

[DrScholl]

What part of no indictment do you not understand? Let it go.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

What part of no indictment do you not understand? Let it go.

Why? It hurts Clinton. So why?

[DrScholl]

What part of no indictment do you not understand? Let it go.

Why? It hurts Clinton. So why?

Again, what part of no indictment do you not understand? Get on with your life.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

What part of no indictment do you not understand? Let it go.

Why? It hurts Clinton. So why?

Again, what part of no indictment do you not understand? Get on with your life.

Who's talking about indictment? This thread is not about it

It is about "Clinton emailed classified information after leaving State Dept"

What part of it do you not understand?

[DrScholl]

What part of no indictment do you not understand? Let it go.

Why? It hurts Clinton. So why?

Again, what part of no indictment do you not understand? Get on with your life.

Who's talking about indictment? This thread is not about it

It is about "Clinton emailed classified information after leaving State Dept"

What part of it do you not understand?

It's a dead issue since there was no indictment. Get over it.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

It's a dead issue since there was no indictment. Get over it.

It clearly is not. Look at the polls

[kyc0705]

The New York Post is not a credible source! Stop spamming

I highly doubt News Corp. made this up.

LOL.
Is it just me, or was there not a time a couple months ago where Seriously was calling the New York Post garbage media (and trump was also, for that matter) ?

Find that thread, because I never call the Post garbage.

I call the Times absolute garbage because they claim to be this paragon of virtue and they are hacks in the bag for the Democrats.

At least you know the Post is a Republican-leaning tabloid.

If "absolute garbage" can still get 117 Pulitzers, then perhaps hacks aren't too bad after all.

And sadly reduced to regurgitating DNC talking points and dismantling their polling operation. They are a shadow of what they used to be. The wall between news and editorial that was a hallmark of the Times is as porous as our wall with Mexico.

Then why are they still getting prizes in 2016? Their most recent Pulitzer is for a project by one of their writers on political corruption and lobbying: http://www.pulitzer.org/prize-winners-by-year/2015

[Torie]

Hillary would be toast running against any vaguely reasonable Pub. Damn, she's lucky.