Mitt Romney vs Jill Stein

[Panda Express]

vote

[LLR]

Romney is actually qualified to handle the job, so him.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

Jill Stein without second thought

[Figueira]

Stein, easily.

[Higgs]

Romney (sane).

[Antonio the Sixth]

Still Stein. #NeverGOP

[Grumpier Than Thou]

Jill Stein without second thought

[MasterJedi]

Here you'll see all the "pro-science" Dems vote for the "anti-science" wingnut because she's liberal.

[DavidB.]

Romney (sane).

[OSR stands with Israel]

Romney easily(sane)

[Grumpier Than Thou]

Here you'll see all the "pro-science" Dems vote for the "anti-science" wingnut because she's liberal.

I mean, if you're trying to demean a leftist for being anti-science, putting them against a conservative (or most modern republicans) isn't really helpful.

[Mr. Smith]

Romney reluctantly. Both have gone different directions since 2012, Romney for the better, Stein for the worse.

[Maxwell]

Romney's still trash.

Stein.

[Unconditional Surrender Truman]

Of these choices, Romney. In the real world (assuming Stein is nominated by the Dems), I would vote Libertarian.

[MasterJedi]

Here you'll see all the "pro-science" Dems vote for the "anti-science" wingnut because she's liberal.

I mean, if you're trying to demean a leftist for being anti-science, putting them against a conservative (or most modern republicans) isn't really helpful.

I'm pretty sure Romney hasn't pandered to anti-vaxxers or said that wifi could be dangerous to children so they should be exposed and we should have a de-facto ban on wifi.

[Blair]

Romney; if I expect sane Republicans to support Clinton/Not Support Trump I must do the same when confronted with a clear idiot like Stein

[Lexii, harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy]

Here you'll see all the "pro-science" Dems vote for the "anti-science" wingnut because she's liberal.

I mean, if you're trying to demean a leftist for being anti-science, putting them against a conservative (or most modern republicans) isn't really helpful.

I'm pretty sure Romney hasn't pandered to anti-vaxxers or said that wifi could be dangerous to children so they should be exposed and we should have a de-facto ban on wifi.

I'm not so sure that pandering to their oil industry is  any better

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

Stein would be incompetent in a benign way, Romney competent at malicious goals.

Stein.

[Tartarus Sauce]

Romney, he has the capacity to govern as a competent moderate leader when not needing to make appeals to the far-right elements of his party. Stein is legitimately nuts.

[Illiniwek]

Mittens

[Figueira]

Stein would be incompetent in a benign way, Romney competent at malicious goals.

Stein.

[they don't love you like i love you]

Here you'll see all the "pro-science" Dems vote for the "anti-science" wingnut because she's liberal.

Uh, she's not liberal. She's actually closer to far right than anything liberal seeing as how she's basically owned by Putin.

[Figueira]

Here you'll see all the "pro-science" Dems vote for the "anti-science" wingnut because she's liberal.

The main "science" issue today is climate change which Romney doesn't have a great track record on.

[Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends]

Romney.

[Enduro]

Romney, and here's 5 reasons why:

1. He's alright in my book, I would've actually considered changing my vote from Johnson to him if he was the Republican nominee.

2. He's not insane.

3. He's not a criminal.

4. He's not a member of the Green Party.

5. He's not Jill Stein.